7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHI may be getting the pic idea... maybe
Leading reported evidence
Use "avitar" ( a word i never heard of
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
The one I used for my "avitar" ( a word I NEVER heard of before this forum) was a reduced size pic from my pictures file.
Leading evidence: 'Use "avitar" ( a word i never heard of' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Set image resolution' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
In your image software, set the image resolution to 72 dpi (may be that already - 72 dpi is standard screen resolution)
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Then set the image size in pixels to scale it for posting on this forum - or in Email etc etc
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Always keep the original large file on your hard drive or CD/DVD for use another time.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
if you are using windows XP there is a new tool that is very convinent called the
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T203514Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I think part of the trouble I've been having is my pics were all too high a resolution originally. The one I used for my "avitar" ( a word I NEVER heard of before this forum) was a reduced size pic from my pictures file. Whenever I used it for an attached pic it just came out small again. I guess now I am going to have to find out how to take pics that have a resolution that works here or simply decide sharing pics here is not worth just taking a bunch of crappy resolution photo's. Seems like a tough site to post a pic on to me. Never had this much trouble before on Audiworld or emailing friends.
There is a size limit (in megabytes) on attachments. However, you could always upload your hi-resolution photos to a free photo sharing website and link to it. Just keep in mind that not everyone is on a high-speed connection so I would still limit the size of the photos to 600x800 and under 1MB -- if people like your pictures they will ask for a higher resolution copy.
P.S. The correct spelling is "avatar" not "avitar" -- probably why you hadn't heard of avitar before.
You need some software (Photoshop or something similar) to reduce the size of your original image file for posting online.
You should continue shooting large original files for max quality.
In your image software, set the image resolution to 72 dpi (may be that already - 72 dpi is standard screen resolution)
Then set the image size in pixels to scale it for posting on this forum - or in Email etc etc
This is a 900x600 pixel image at 72 dpi
Then save as a medium quality JPEG to reduce file size still further (JPEG is image compression)
Always keep the original large file on your hard drive or CD/DVD for use another time.
Chris.
Thanks for the info. Never used photoshop. Guess I need to to post pics, maybe someday when I have more time. To the guy asking about wheels they are the stock 5 spoke 18's for 2003.
Even the lite version of Photoshop will do it - you just need some basic image editing software that allows you to scale your digial images and save in a format that reduces file size.
Free software like iPhoto on a Mac would do it for you too - not sure which platform you are on?
Most forums like to limit image size to avoid their servers being filled up, and avoid their users waiting ages for large image files to download when reading threads.
Most photographers like their large files for best print quality, so the software I'm talking about just allows you to scale copies accordingly for web viewing or Email.
You probably got some free software with your camera that would do the trick - or check out
http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshopelwin
Chris.
if you are using windows XP there is a new tool that is very convinent called the
Image resizer powertoy
it lets you right click pictures inside windows and resize them to proper size in 2-3 clicks.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/d...powertoys.mspx
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
