16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHChoices... which wing to put on....
Leading reported evidence
Install front, sides etc
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
As long as all the parts are installed front, sides etc...RUF is still my favorite.
Leading evidence: 'Install front, sides etc' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install front, sides etc' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
For example I shant be fitting mine until I replace the stock 5 spoke C2 rims with something more fitting as I just dont think it will look right.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Also, as Marc points out, you can't use the taco on a cab (unless you never plan to put the top down!).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T052503Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I love the look of the Taco wing as its so unique to the car, and it looks awesome in dark colours. Would be my preference, in fact I am picking one up for my own Black C2 on Friday...
It also kind of depends on whetehr or not you have skirts or other kit, and the wheels you are pairing it with. For example I shant be fitting mine until I replace the stock 5 spoke C2 rims with something more fitting as I just dont think it will look right.
If coupe and you have prerequisite of the side skirts and gt3 front bumper, then Taco is a must.
Otherwise something else as Taco only looks "correct" with the other matching gt3 pieces. Yes I do sound like a snob.
I like the taco wing, but I agree that it needs the other aero bits to look right. Also, as Marc points out, you can't use the taco on a cab (unless you never plan to put the top down!).
My car is a MKII, but I will be adding the Taco style spoiler. Partly as I got a great deal, but mainly as I prefer it to the later one on black cars, its very unique.
Im not too worried about originality as such, happy to stick a duck on if I felt like it.. but know what you mean
I just think the Taco looks better on the Mk1 because the lines are softer and it all flows better than on the later cars.
Not worried about originality either.
regardless, enjoy!
