27 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHIMS upgrade in California
Leading reported evidence
Replace original post
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Replace original post' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check clutch condition, and perhaps' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I am also hearing people that had the engine replaced with a creat porsche engine with "all the upgrades" are also having failures AGAIN.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Scott, anyone who can change a clutch on a 996, should be able to handle this upgrade with no issues.
Replace coolant every 2 years, never track the car
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Besides, I never drive it under 2800 rpm, change the coolant every 2 years, never track the car, use an approved 5w50 synthetic oil ...
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
My mechanic will be purchasing the retrofit kit from "Flat 6..." just when I'd be able to afford it (in Spain we have a great economic crisis) and them, I know that I'll probably never get my engine blown caused by IMS bearing, but I am one of the most carefully users who change the engine oil every 5.000 miles and all the filters, always use the car till the oil temperature is perfect to work efficiently, and never turn the engine off till It would recover the normal oil temperature.
Use engine replacement option is looking like a better choice
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
With the possibility of wasting money now on buying another warranty or do the IMS replacement, using the engine replacement option is looking like a better choice.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
27 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T163944Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
My 2001 has 42k miles (Drive about 20k a year- purchased as 2nd owner in 2008 with only 17k)
Was thinking of having the IMS bearing replaced or upgraded when I hit 50k this year.
3 questions:
1. If you had the extra money, would you do this?
2. Do you have suggestions for an independent in Northern Calif. to replace the IMS.
3. Would you replace it with:
a. new oem bearing
b. ceramic hybrid bearings like those used in LN Engineering's IMS Upgrade
c. single-row bearing IMS
Thanks
Scott
1, yes and i am
2 ,Sorry no Im on the worng coast.
3, I am going with the ceramic, becasue the actual cause of the problem has not proven to be identified So we are going to do the "man" thing and over engineer it. I am also hearing people that had the engine replaced with a creat porsche engine with "all the upgrades" are also having failures AGAIN. Now recent I have heard Porsche has made a new chain tensioner for the chain that is on the IMS and it does not put as much pressure on the chain.
My car has 103K on it. In a few weeks it is going in for the ceramic bearing, vario cam chains and tensioners, and the guy that is doing the work is trying his hardest to talk me into cracking the case and installing the other bearing on the ims. This will also allow us to change the tensioner you can not get to unless you crack the case. I think this is the route I am going to go.
Understand that there are probably not enough "IMS upgrades" that have been completed to be able to answer your question with any amount of certainty. The premise is that it should "greatly reduce" the potential of failures due to the IMS [edit]
issue
.
There is no "OEM bearing". Porsche does not offer an IMS bearing, just an entirely "updated" IMS shaft that requires full engine disassembly to install.
Your 01 engine already has a single row IMS bearing, the majority of 01 engines do.
Its yet to be proven. But my research tells me the ceramic bearing gives you a lot better chance. If you are over 80K on the clock you should really drop the engine and do the internal bearing and all the tensioners with the upgraded tensioner on the ims chain. Failure of any of the tnesioners can give the same result as the IMS failre. It is my understanding at 100K they are pretty well worn. But I have yet to see this for my self. I will report back
Is there any recomendation on who can do the IMS upgrade in Australia?
Has any Aussie had the upgrade done?
And if so what was the cost in Australia?
Thanks
I have a 997 but an early '05 with the 996 single-row bearing. If it were to need a clutch I might consider adding the LN bearing, but I won't spend ~$2K
just
to put in the bearing, because as has been stated many times, there are several other parts that can fail and result in the need for a new engine. Since I wouldn't own a European car without an extended warranty because of the many other expensive things that go wrong (years of experience with BMW, Volvo and M/B, extended warranties paid me back in some cases 2-3X their cost) I will probably just leave it to chance. If my engine fails I will put in one of Jake's completely remanufactured engines with all the beefed-up internals, even if I have to pay up the difference between what it costs and whatever the warranty authorizes.
There's no right or wrong answer to this question, just a matter of each individual's own decision.
I think that everyone of us who have not Approved Porsche Warranty, should upgrade the bearing...
But there is another important question too:
You have to know that you are the one and only responsible person about your engine improvement. What I mean is:
You can upgrade the IMS, OK!
and... what would happen if your engine blowns 2 months later??
Are you going to kill your mechanic?
Are you going to demand LN/Raby ?
They give you a warranty only if the IMS upgrade is made by them.
Think that a M96 engine could breakdown due to several reasons, not only the IMS bearing.
I'm going to do it. My mechanic will be purchasing the retrofit kit from "Flat 6..." just when I'd be able to afford it (in Spain we have a great economic crisis) and them, I know that I'll probably never get my engine blown caused by IMS bearing, but I am one of the most carefully users who change the engine oil every 5.000 miles and all the filters, always use the car till the oil temperature is perfect to work efficiently, and never turn the engine off till It would recover the normal oil temperature. Besides, I never drive it under 2800 rpm, change the coolant every 2 years, never track the car, use an approved 5w50 synthetic oil ...
Is my engine go to blown someday? Who knows it... Perhaps It will have a cylinder issue, or an oil/coolant mix.... who knows...
What I know is that I believe in Jake Raby, and I'm well informed about M96 engines to be aware what we have.
Nevertheless, the point of view of a Porsche Specialist is very different from owners. My mechanic told me:
If I do the retrofit work, we need:
- oil drain
- down engine
- check clutch condition, and perhaps change it
- install retrofit IMS bearing
- new oil filters...
All these works are close to 2500-3000$
So, we are spending 1/3 of a new engine cost to reinforced it, but not sure It will be the complete solution. A new engine come with new waperpump, alternator, etc I think that, if your car has more than 60.000 miles it would be better to do the complete upgrade and dismantle the engine to check all the parts and replace all you'd need. Engines with low mileage as mine (23000 miles) are "young enough" to be improved only with retrofit kit
M96 engines are not the best porsche creation...
Tillman's Engineering is doing my IMS retrofit right now. I would recommend them as they are very knowledable with all Porsche issues and are very trustworthy. I have been going there for years. They are located in Santa Rosa, Ca
Anyone knows which shop can do a best and good price job for this IMS upgrade in LOS ANGELES area? i just bought a 996, so i want to do it asap, thanks guys.
Not sure what they'll charge you, but in my dealings with them, as well as others I know who race with me, it's been a very positive experience having them do things or buying their products.
sheatley, if you're still open to input on doing the IMS;
I wouldn't do it if it were my own car, in fact I didn't when I did a clutch in my last C2 about a year ago.
I also find it interesting that IMS failures were almost unheard of a few years ago, before an "upgrade" part was manufactured and marketed. I remember issues of cylinder D chunking and cracked heads (the latter I think is far more common an issue btw), and broken cats and the like being the conversation topics back then, though honestly none of these problems seem common in the real world.
Here's my justification for not doing the bearing, you will spend a non trivial amount of money, just to cover your bases for one of the "what if" scenarios. A used engine can be had for $4-6k today, is spending $2k on your engine now really financially smart, just in case? Also, the IMS is not the only part whose failure would result in something very unpleasant. There's the wheel bearings, tie rods, steering coupler(s), so on.
I didn't do it on my own car, and I don't plan to advise any customers or friends to do this in the future either, but hey to each his own. If it'll put your mind at ease for whatever reason, that is certainly a very real benefit, and if the ~$1-2k cost is justifiable to you, then it's a simple choice.
Ahmet,
After my initial post some weeks ago, I have been moving more into the direction you reference. Playing the odds, my engine will more than likely not blow up soon. With the possibility of wasting money now on buying another warranty or do the IMS replacement, using the engine replacement option is looking like a better choice.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.