Rennlist

Need February 2009 NADA or KBB for '99 996 values

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

5 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHNeed February 2009 NADA or KBB for '99 996 values

Leading reported evidence

Run carfax and found it was originally a nj car

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
When a potential buyer recently looked at it, he ran a Carfax and found it was originally a NJ car, with an accident in late '99 and 3 owners before my friend, all but the NJ owner here in CO.
Original post Read captured discussion
Need February 2009 NADA or KBB for '99 996 values

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run carfax and found it was originally a nj car' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run carfax and found it was originally a nj car' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 5 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Use car salesman

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I wouldn't believe some half wit used car salesman for all the tea in China.
Original post Read captured discussion
Need February 2009 NADA or KBB for '99 996 values

Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run carfax and found it was originally a nj car

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
When a potential buyer recently looked at it, he ran a Carfax and found it was originally a NJ car, with an accident in late '99 and 3 owners before my friend, all but the NJ owner here in CO.
Original post Read captured discussion
Need February 2009 NADA or KBB for '99 996 values

Use car salesman

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I wouldn't believe some half wit used car salesman for all the tea in China.
Original post Read captured discussion
Need February 2009 NADA or KBB for '99 996 values

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Long shot plea for help here.... If anyone still has a copy or even a printout from KBB, NADA, or Edmunds from around February of 2009 for a 996 C2, I would REALLY appreciate if you could share it with me. Trying to help out a friend who was screwed by a local dealer on a '99 996 last year. The car is really nice, but the dealer represented it as a no-story, 1 owner, CA car. When a potential buyer recently looked at it, he ran a Carfax and found it was originally a NJ car, with an accident in late '99 and 3 owners before my friend, all but the NJ owner here in CO. The dealer knows they lied to my friend and is saying they care, but not DOING anything about it. I would like to look up the value from Feb. 2009 (when my friend purchased the car) and compare it to today and have an attorney friend send a demand letter telling them they must buy the car back at the purchase price less the difference in NADA/KBB/Edmunds value to today. Hope that makes sense and hope someone has access to one of these. My local library throws away all but the current issue. Thanks, Joe

POST 2Original post

Is there any written evidence the car was represented as stated? Without that, he doesn't have a chance. I learned the hard way. I think your friend is entitled to the difference between a 3 owner/1 accident car, and the no issue one owner car. I don't know how to put a dollar value on it, and without written proof, the dealer will never pay.

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Evidence of the misrepresentation is not the issue. I need to document the value in February 2009. They charged a premium value then for a misrepresented car. Our plan is to demand that they buy the car back at the purchase price less the difference in "book value" . Of course they won't do it, but it will be where we will decide to go forward from.

POST 4Original post

Had this happen with my S4...dealer made a couple payments for me. They said no accidents...had one minor hit upfront.

POST 5Original post

It's called buyer beware. I wouldn't believe some half wit used car salesman for all the tea in China. It amazes me how many people take other folks at there word..... Believe in the power of the human spirt, but determine the intent of those who use that power to mislead and deceive....

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.