11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH9th birthday present----leather redo
Leading reported evidence
Repair /touch ups..the guy happened
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
So while at the dealer the other day I asked my mechanic friend who does their leather repair/touch ups..The guy happened to be there that day.
Leading evidence: 'Repair /touch ups..the guy happened' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Repair /touch ups..the guy happened' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I've been thinking about one or both changes for a while.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T150039Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi all..
I figured at her 9th bday..the 996 should get something special..
And as we all know ..savanna beige does not look good when worn..
The front seats were not looking good ..and last year I had bought a set of full leather seats for the rear(since the originals were vinyl). The rears were a slightly,less faded shade of "peanut butter"..so they did not match perfectly..
So while at the dealer the other day I asked my mechanic friend who does their leather repair/touch ups..The guy happened to be there that day. We set an appointment for the work.
He came to my house and did all the seats, hand brake, cubby top, and fixed a nasty scratch on the steering wheel. It took about 2 1/2 hours with most of the time spent removing seats and taping off..
Though not perfect(car has 35k miles) and to the trained eye, you can tell its been redone...I am very happy with the results..makes the car really look alot newer..
I had read here where some have bought the leatherique" kit for about $200 and done it themselves..I figured I would pay a little more and get it done by a a pro...and it is guaranteed for 1 year...
HAPPY BDAY 1999 996!
What would black seats look like in a savannah beige interior? I have a set of fully electric memory seats out of a TT and a set of black sport seats. I have two cars with beige seats, one savannah the other cashmere and don't like either set of seats, and not necessarily the color. The cashmeres are too soft, the savannah seems to have been used by someone who put all his weight at the very back of the seat bottom, way different than my seating position. I've been thinking about one or both changes for a while. I would of course have to keep the originals for resale at some point.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
