13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHIs This A Good Deal?
Leading reported evidence
Check those out
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Check those out' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check those out' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T220748Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
GT3 wheels are nice and light, I think they look better on a narrowbody. What wheels do you have? If you have the sport technology wheels they are lighter and look better on a C4S, nearly a 4k option from the factory.
Chris
Not sure about those. They do look ok on the GT3 and are VERY light. I still think the sport technos are the nicest looking wheel in the wide body. Have you checked those out?
Yes I have, but I'm trying to get away from the big (5 spoke) look, and get something busier, like the Fikse FM10, or BBS LM....haven't decided yet....one more thing, should I consider moving up to 19" on my C4S? Will it rub at all?? I've seen pix, and love the way it fills the wheel well.
If those numbers are right, those are NOT GT3 wheels. The correct specs are Front: 18X8.5 offset 40, Rear 18X11 offset 63.
I still like the TT hollows best for lightness and priced as takeoffs. But, I agree, a bit more bling-bling would be nice.
The only thing about those BBs Lm style is that they are a bitch and a half to keep clean, one hard outing in my car and the spokes are black from brake dust!
