7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHwarning in nj
Leading reported evidence
Inspect (3/07)
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Thanx for the heads up...time to get my DD inspected (3/07)
Leading evidence: 'Inspect (3/07)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Inspect (3/07)' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
This stat isn’t verifiable but neither are the stats used by the Establishment.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
They're using laser, too, to add insult to injury.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T031046Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
the nj state troopers are on a tix barrage til the end of this month. my source tells me they are expected to write 3 summons per hour. they are also sending out extra man power when they can, and will be utilizing 30 new unmarked cars. watch out as they are lowering their threshold to just 6 mph over posted limit.
sorry to sound the alarm
this is a false rumour:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/traffic/speeding.asp
__________________
Hmmm..making they are trying to make up for the 11 corrupted officials that just got busted.
Thanx for the heads up...time to get my DD inspected (3/07)
In hindsight we'll look at this time as the golden years of driving sports cars. Unfortunately local and State governments have discovered that moving violations is just a delightful way to collect additional revenue. The poor residents of Va are the first to experience this firsthand with the draconian fines that have been imposed on State residents for moving violations.
It's just a matter of time before there will be hidden cameras throughout the country that will detect moving violations, and you'll simply be mailed your $200 or $300 fine in the mail. I recently went to Washington DC and they had these dam cameras on virtually every street.
Oh it's coming. It's already happened in the UK - the country with the highest density of surveillance cameras in the world. On virtually every road now there are violation cameras. You honestly wouldn't believe how common they are. And it's all revenue for the authorities........
The Establishment vilifies speeders classing them on the same level as drunk drivers. Speeders are responsible for millions of accidents resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths each year. This stat isn’t verifiable but neither are the stats used by the Establishment. We constantly hear reports that say “speed may have been involved” in the accident. What would the Establishment do if there were no speeders? How would they make up for the huge revenue shortfall? What would happen to all the business dependent on speeders? How would insurance companies survive unable to increase rate or deny coverage?
The worst aspect about the “punish the speeder industry” is the discriminatory nature of the industry. The poor, the under class, the little guy and the unconnected can’t get tickets fixed like many of well connected can. The people that make up the Establishment don’t pay speeding tickets. Have you ever heard of someone in law enforcement getting a speeding ticket much less paying a speeding fine? It doesn’t happen.
Many countries, England for one, has cameras around every corner but the next campaign in the war is going to be GPS and/or black box based. Funded by insurance companies and supported by the Establishment, it’s coming. Counter measure will be available but, again only the well to do will be able to afford it.
The only way to stem the tide IMO would require a massive grass roots efforts but that’s unlike again IMO because it’s political incorrect to support speeders.
I got myself all worked up so I’m going for a drive on my favorite section of twisty.
Have a great day and drive safely.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.