fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

annoying image varification issues

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
19 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHannoying image varification issues

Leading reported evidence

Adjust security settings

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If it's in the same spots as active-x and other things that show up at the bottom of the browser menu bar then adjust your security settings to standard or what ever cures the problem.

Original post Read captured discussion
annoying image varification issues
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Adjust security settings' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust security settings' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 19 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Adjust security settings

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If it's in the same spots as active-x and other things that show up at the bottom of the browser menu bar then adjust your security settings to standard or what ever cures the problem.

Original post Read captured discussion
annoying image varification issues
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T192637Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

this should be discussed.......how many times do we not understand the stupid image? forcing us to reset and begin again when participating on rennlist......MOST ANNOYING forum with the image varification. WHY is it necessary anyway???????????

POST 4Original post

What? You should only get somthing like that upon registration.

POST 5Original post

I thought that only happens when you go through airport security?!

POST 7Original post

You should not be getting that verification. What browser, OS are you using?

POST 8Original post

aracer, can you post a screen shot? something is not making sense here.

POST 9Original post

AWE Thats not IMAGE verification, that's INCOME varification... if you forward me your SSN I can help you out on this one PLEASE DO NOT ACTUALLY FORWARD YOUR SSN !!

POST 10Original post

Quotes source post: 7192650

Ed seems to have moved to Nigeria.

POST 11Original post

Hahahaha I will send you a $25k check and all you have to do is cash it and return the rest to me

POST 12Original post

Quotes source post: 7192685

.... because the needed the extra room to store his Porsche parts!

POST 13Original post

Quotes source post: 7191497

OK, varification, whatever it may be has been discussed. Can we move on?

POST 14Original post

Look at the top bar of the window that pops up to see what software causes it and post it. If it's in the same spots as active-x and other things that show up at the bottom of the browser menu bar then adjust your security settings to standard or what ever cures the problem. Screen shot by hitting PrtScn then open a graphics program and paste the picture of the screen. Then just crop it down so it isn't giant picture and save it as a jpg so it once again isn't a large file size. Then send me gift card for the newest GT2 or 3 out there.

POST 19Original post

Could be a spam bot has gotten into your computer so that the image verification portion of registering and you having to duplicate the nmbers and letters you see in the image is being guessed wrong by the bot when it is trying to steal your account. Something weird thats for sure.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.