Rennlist

Thinking about a stereo upgrade

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

3 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHThinking about a stereo upgrade

Leading reported evidence

Run pretty good system at home (acurus, rotel, b&w's)

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I run a pretty good system at home (Acurus, Rotel, B&W's) but I have no illusions about or cash to try to duplicate that in the car.
Original post Read captured discussion
Thinking about a stereo upgrade

Frequently discussed work

Run nuclear submarine

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
- yes I can run a nuclear submarine but I can't change my own oil, go figure.) The next contender is the stereo.
Original post Read captured discussion
Thinking about a stereo upgrade

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run pretty good system at home (acurus, rotel, b&w's)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run nuclear submarine' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 3 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Run nuclear submarine

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
- yes I can run a nuclear submarine but I can't change my own oil, go figure.) The next contender is the stereo.
Original post Read captured discussion
Thinking about a stereo upgrade

Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run nuclear submarine

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
- yes I can run a nuclear submarine but I can't change my own oil, go figure.) The next contender is the stereo.
Original post Read captured discussion
Thinking about a stereo upgrade

Run pretty good system at home (acurus, rotel, b&w's)

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I run a pretty good system at home (Acurus, Rotel, B&W's) but I have no illusions about or cash to try to duplicate that in the car.
Original post Read captured discussion
Thinking about a stereo upgrade

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T013556Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Happy New Year folks! I hope its appropriate posting this in the 996 forum vice "off topic" or elsewhere, if not please advise. So I'm still on my extended business trip, and I'm spending more time on Rennlist and thinking about what the service and upgrade priorities are in 2010. First are 4 new summer tires (thinking Sumitomo HTR III from Tire Rack?) and a trip to my indy shop for a service. The easy mod will be the clear side lights (thanks for the links and info last month, hopefully even I can install them! - yes I can run a nuclear submarine but I can't change my own oil, go figure.) The next contender is the stereo. As my Targa may become a daily driver if I move offices and can't take public transit, I'd like a better sounding stereo with ipod integration. The car has the Bose upgrade that was part of the technic package in '03, but the CD controls are erratic and sometimes the whole system locks up. Given that I like good quality sound but want to keep this on a budget (under $1000, ideally closer to $600), has anyone upgraded recently or have any recommendations? I have no idea what the market is like so I don't know if speakers and an amp+face are possible at this pricepoint with quality sound, or if I should just start with a new amp and control unit to get the ipod hook up and think about speakers later. I run a pretty good system at home (Acurus, Rotel, B&W's) but I have no illusions about or cash to try to duplicate that in the car. With the Targa wind noise, its a little tough anyway Thanks for any ideas! Lawrence

POST 2Original post

I think I'm going to go with the Fujitsu Eclipse 726E http://www.eclipse-web.com/us/avn/avn726eoverviews.html Badass!

POST 3Original post

Happy new year to you as well. Tip or 6 speed? As a DD 6 speed can be left in lower gears for more sound. I opted for motor sound over stereo, but understand the need for music. Good luck on it. Btw sumis are a great tire for the pricen and we are going have a pig pile on you and make you change that oil yourself. Its super simple!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.