18 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAvatar Apologies....
Reported or suspected cause
expensive overhaul
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause · Original poster
Interesting observation, guess the all wheel drive gearing is backwards in the front...Probably an expensive overhaul!!!
Leading evidence: 'expensive overhaul' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'expensive overhaul' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
18 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T163944Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Thank you all for bearing with me while I indulged myself with the questionable avatar that was posted recently. Those who saw it know what I am talking about. I would especially like extend my apologies to those who were offended or were caught in an uncomfortable situation from not expecting it or being surprised in the presence of others when a thread was being viewed and they scrolled past one of my reply's.
Hope the current one is more to the people's liking???
Respectfully,
Chris
It was a fine butt shaking and flexing, Pamela Anderson stylie!!! Sorry you missed it...send me a note and I will send it off to you for your own pleasure and laughter. It's banned on Rennlist however...
I cought that yesterday too! I was deeply offended as well! Where do you get off posting an avatar that looks fake...In the futures if your going to post that kind of pic make it shake evenly and smooth. It just looked wierd made me SICK!
Yes very weird - I noticed that as well (LOL). I guess someone was reading threads when there wife was nearby. It's bad enough we sit here and talk about cars all day, but now to use it as a forum to look as girl's asses just puts it over the top. Whoever ended up in the doghouse over that, I feel for you brother. Next time say you are working late and go to a topless bar. That's what I do...
