10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH3.4L 1999 engine question
Leading reported evidence
Run accusump, x51 pan
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I run an accusump, X51 pan, and change oil after every race weekend.
Leading evidence: 'Run accusump, x51 pan' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace oil' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I run an accusump, X51 pan, and change oil after every race weekend.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I know in 2002 then motor was replaced with a 3.6L....should I stay away from this engine?
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
The car I am looking at is fully set up sccca track car which had the issue fixed.
I'm in the process of purchasing a 99 Carrera. I know these engines have a intermediate shaft bearing issue. The car I am looking at is fully set up sccca track car which had the issue fixed. I've read some really mixed things about this engine. I know in 2002 then motor was replaced with a 3.6L....should I stay away from this engine?
The 3.6L engine has some benefits, such as a little bit more torque and horsepower, plus a better variable cam timing system, which is also easier to repair if a solenoid goes out.
The 3.6L has a smaller weaker IMS bearing than the early 3.4L. You can address this though with a retrofitted IMS bearing and certainly the benefits of the 3.6L (2002+) outweigh the 3.6L.
The early 3.4L has a cable operated throttle (2wd), whereas the 1999 3.4L 4wd and onwards has an electronic throttle.
from the 3.4L engine in general, no. but I'd make myself fully aware of the history of the one that you are considering (miles, hours on the motor, oil seperator, oil pan, accusump, etc).
Are you going to track it or race it? If racing you'll want to look at the rule book (PCA, NASA, SCCA), figure out which class you be runing, and decide if your car will be competitive vs the locals.
I plan on racing it with NASA and pboc at first. The previous owner of this car is Marius avemarg who raced it with pboc and won the championship in the r4 class. The car was sponsored by rebel rock. I'm just nervous about these engines.
I've looked at his FS post a few times. I hear you about the engine, I was always more concerned about the oiling issues more than any other. I run an accusump, X51 pan, and change oil after every race weekend. Good luck keep posting on how this progresses.
Would u believe that the seller and I agreed in writing via email on a price pending a ppi that was scheduled for tomorrow; just now he sends me a txt that he sold the car to another seller for more money. The lawyer in me want to crush him. He is a semi pro gt racer for a pro racing team in florida in a 997 cup car. The car that he agreed to sell me was sponsored by a major national beverage sponsor. After doing some digging on him and going over the several inconsistencies he told me, i have come to the conclusion that he is shady and not to be trusted. Beware!
You know with the IMS and RMS problems, the porous cases, the cracked heads and intermixes, the slipped sleeves, the bad lifters, chain pads going, water pumps failing, valve seats failing, etc. etc. etc. it is amazing that probably 90%+ of these cars are still going strong
I can't help but think you're taking up the wrong hobby if you're that concerned about the engine in a fully set up SCCCA track car.
Engines in race or tracked cars are wear items of the 1st order. While all owners hope for (and many owners are blessed with) long lived engines even in tracked cars, this is not always the case.
Some 3.4l engines last and last. Others not so much. Ditto 3.6l engines. Even the fabled engines in the GT2/GT3 and Turbo's are not immune from the occasional failure.
Sincerely,
Macster.
Sounds like you blew a motor. There are plenty of well maintained 911s that have not had the issues u discribe. Not buying someone's gift wrapped garbage.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.