22 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHI am truly embarrassed to ask but....
Leading reported evidence
Use elsewhere
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Don't worry it's a Rennlist term that I've never heard used elsewhere.
Leading evidence: 'Use elsewhere' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use elsewhere' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
22 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Guys - I am truly embarrassed to ask as i can only imagine the responses i am going to get but as a Porsche Newbie, i need to know.
Why does everyone keep referring to pumpkin's and what is it as i know it can't be an actual pumpkin that everyone is referring to!
Thanks.
PS - recently purchased a 2002 C4 Cab and needless to say, i'm in heaven. Had some fun with a vette this morning. Well at least i had fun, i don't think the vette in my rear view mirror did
It's the orange side marker lights on the front bumper of your car.
Some people like them, most hate them so they replace them with clear side marker lights instead.
Don't worry it's a Rennlist term that I've never heard used elsewhere.
well from your avatar pic you do not have punkins....
- this need to be more like a 20 questions than a hand out -
come on guys, lets get this newby's post count up
I've heard of a optic-rectomy. That is when the docs go in and severs the nerve that connects your A$$hole to your eyes....supposed to give you a better outlook on life..
The pic's in the avatar. I am having a hard time getting the pic's sized small enough that they'll fit on the website but i promise to figure it out by the weekend.
