fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Will 9" et 52 wheels fit the front?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHWill 9" et 52 wheels fit the front?

Leading reported evidence

Run 9" 37 offset

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Currently, I run 9" 37 offset with a 15mm spacer on 265 tires with no clearance issues either.

Will 9" et 52 wheels fit the front?
Frequently discussed work

Check who will

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Well, if us "common folk" don't keep the statisticians in check, who will?

Will 9" et 52 wheels fit the front?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run 9" 37 offset' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check who will' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 10 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Check who will

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Well, if us "common folk" don't keep the statisticians in check, who will?

Will 9" et 52 wheels fit the front?
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check who will

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Well, if us "common folk" don't keep the statisticians in check, who will?

Will 9" et 52 wheels fit the front?

Run 9" 37 offset

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Currently, I run 9" 37 offset with a 15mm spacer on 265 tires with no clearance issues either.

Will 9" et 52 wheels fit the front?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T175704Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

anyone run this setup in 18"? or close to it? They are essentially boxster size rear wheels but mounted in the front.

POST 2Original post

Use this if you know your current set up. http://www.1010tires.com/WheelOffsetCalculator.asp

POST 3Original post

Absolutely and will fit very nicely. You'd be adding another inch over stock but that is negligible. You'd also get the "look" of adding about a 10mm spacer. Very nice in opinion. As long as it clears the brakes you are fine.

POST 4Original post

Ferd, Compared to the stock 8" and 50mm offset, they will extend an additional 11mm, which will be OK. However, they will have 15mm less inner clearence. This may be an issue. I am not sure how much extra inner clearence there is with the stock 8" wheel.

POST 5Original post

Damn, I was off by 1mm Just had to show me up didn't ya?

POST 6Original post

Well, if us "common folk" don't keep the statisticians in check, who will?

POST 7Original post

It'll fit perfectly fine. w/ 52 offset it barely cleared my friend's spring perches w -2.5 camber. I ran 9" 43 offset -1.8 camber (no spacer), there should be some of my old pic of fitment on RL with 275 tires. Currently, I run 9" 37 offset with a 15mm spacer on 265 tires with no clearance issues either. It does rub the fender liner a bit on full lock.

POST 8Original post

Ferdinand, you my friend are a wheel *****. Which ones are you getting? He has some sweet looking wheels for sale. My favorites were the ones for a GT3, with the hardware on the back.

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

thanks guys.... I need to take a look under my car for those extra inner clearance. Mark... yeah Im bad. I wanted those GT3 wheels but decided against them.... The 12" et64 rears looked good... but decided against them since you have to do major suspension setup (monoballs, rolled fenders, agressive cambers etc) to make them work.

POST 10Original post

Ferdinand, you have the best looking 996 ever. I understand the quest for the perfect wheel. Those GT3 wheels were gorgeous and would have looked great on your car...way too much hassle though. A couple months ago, I saw a set of BBS Magnesium wheels for our cars, on one of the Porsche forums...I was almost tempted for a moment.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.