25 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPanamera
Reported or suspected cause
be
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
yeah, and we know what a piece of junk that turned out to be.
Leading evidence: 'be' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'be' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
25 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Gregg, the Panamera Forum has not been added to the "category" menu on the left side of the screen. Look near the top of that menu and click on Rennlist Forums. You will then see the Panamera Forum listed as the last Forum in the Water Cooled section.
You really think so?
I'm sure that people said exactly the same thing about the 912, 914, 928, 944, 996, Cayenne... get the idea?
I've got to admit that the passions that this car have evoked are pretty funny. Honestly - it sounds like a bunch of 993 guys sitting around picking on the 996. Time to start passing around the gold chains and showing some chest hair.
There is nothing wrong with this car and I'm sure people will recognize that when they see it in person.
The exterior is classic Porsche styling, the interior is no different than you would find in many modern sedans. I fail to see why people have worked up such a passionate dislike to this car, even though they've never seen it. At least withhold spitting acid until you've sat in it and driven it.
yup, I already have one on my shopping list.
The price that has just been announced will put it into the price range that I'm willing to pay for a car in a few years.
Exactly. Flash back 10 years and people were saying the same things about the Boxster.
And the Cayenne too for that matter.
The big ballers will get 'em and install Tech Art kits, etc, and they'll become a little fad.
The problem with the car is not its looks.
It's the fact that its an ultra-premium gas guzzler sedan, 5 years ago that would've been fine, but now the timing is all off.
Porsche needs to get hot on its hybrid development and get it in this car.
My .02 Pfenning.
Yup, I think that many of those currently spitting venom about the Panamera will have a quiet case of revisionist history once they see one and find themselves buying one.... "Oh, yeah, I loved it from the moment I saw it!"
I think that it's a great looking car and will finally be the family Porsche.
I can see the day coming where my kids will get too big for the Carrera and the Panamera will enable people like me to continue to drive a performance Porsche without having to leave the kids behind.
I love it. Who wants to have another S class shaped "sedan". That's why I've always loved Citroens. They take chances; some of them successful, others not, but you can't blame them for being a lemming.
I'd take one and I'm thinking, it'll have some great driving dynamics.
I got the poster today, and it looks pretty good. The important thing is how it dirves, which I imagine is AWESOME! I'm sure it will put any BMW, Lexus, Audi, 4-seater to shame.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
