34 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNeed mk1 GT3 Rear Wing - leads anyone?
Reported or suspected cause
wash or very close at least
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'wash or very close at least' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'wash or very close at least' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Recommend seeing the wing' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Yup, I'd recommend seeing the wing before purchase.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
34 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm looking for an mk1 GT3 (Aerokit) rear wing. Either factory OEM or a very good replica with movable wing element. I've been watching EBay and only saw 1 in recent weeks.
Any leads? Other places I should be looking?
- Bill
They are on ebay all the time, but they are all aftermarket. There's also MAShaw. If you want to hold out for OEM, you will either pay the piper or wait until one comes up for sale.
Is the mkII aerokit wing the same as the 996 GT3 wing? I'm considering (if it was a reasonable price) what a GT3 rear wing would look like on the back of my 40th...
I doubt the GT3 rear wing adds any weight. The stock lid is metal and the replacement wing and decklid are fiberglass. It's probably a wash or very close at least.
Actually, no. The aero wings are lighter than the stock spoiler, as they're made out of fiberglass.
My aero wing was lighter than the decklid I removed.
Suncoast has the OEM MKII for $3680 and a replica for $1695. Make sure you get the aerocup wing, not the GT3 wing as the intake ducting is in a different location. Ask me how I know. However, I will be developing autocad plans this spring for a custom intake to make it work properly.
Yup, I'd recommend seeing the wing before purchase. I have an OEM wing now, but the first purchase was an, ahem, "exact copy" from DPS. It wasn't an exact copy and I ended up sending it back.
The MKII wing is probably easier to purchase an an aftermarket copy, because unlike the MKI wing it doesn't have any moving parts. I believe that Marc bought his from MAShaw and was happy with it.
Very pleased with the MA Shaw wing, no problems, fits perfect.
All the other Aero parts on my car are Porsche but I was not to thrilled about spending 3K+ on the factory wing.
I would get a front bumper too cause not really recommended to mix aero wing and turbo front. Personally I would stick with the 40th look with no wing or do a complete earokit II look just like what Marc Gelefsky did to his car.
I love the front end of my car so I'm definitely not going to change that out. That's probably why I haven't seen a 40th with one of those rear wings on it... I still think it would look pretty cool though!
Those MA Shaw wings look well done. Are they dimensionally identical to the OE wings?
>>My aero wing was lighter than the decklid I removed.
Any idea how much lighter the aerokit wing/lid assemblies are than the C2 motorized lids?
- Bill
I think none of the replicas have the 3 point adjustability that that the OEM's have.
Suncoast sells MK1 replicas.... give them a call
Note:... whats even harder to get is the gurney lip, which imo completes the look. GL
http://e-partssales.com/Merchant2/me...Code=POTE996EX
... I was strictly speaking MK1 wings.... it is what the OP wants afterall.
But, my info on Mk1 wings are based on knowledge that is 2 years old... Mk1 replicas could have changed... though i doubt it.
