16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHDon't buy my car!
Leading reported evidence
Check from washington mutual, i hope
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Oh, and I'm not sure what you guys are talking about, I sent my money first, it's a cashiers check from Washington Mutual, I hope that's okay.
Leading evidence: 'Check from washington mutual, i hope' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check from washington mutual, i hope' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Or, maybe it's just a mistake, like maybe there was an upgrade and it changed the permissions.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'm new here, but not new to forums or running forums.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T124918Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
No, seriously, don't buy my car.
I made an ad - but that was just to see how the new classified section works.
All offers, except the truly ludicrous, will be ignored.
Now get out there and drive some more!
Van, I wish I would have read this thread earlier, because I just bought your car. The shipping van will be there tomorrow morning to pick it up. Sorry man, I wish I had known sooner!!!
AWE MAN -
why didnt I look here first,
Hey Van... can you just send me back the $60k I just sent via international money order...OH and I included $5k for shipping ... you can keep that for your inconvience.
Right, I always liked the members only sales posting, usually kept the "riff raff" out and limited the scams
Other than that, since John D is gone I have no desire to add revenue to the site with a member fee especially if there is nothing in return.
+1
I think we will see plenty of ebay style sales of worthless junk
maybe they can charge a fee for that? then buy some money transfer website and charge for that sevice too... then give "points" to good people and little stars...
wait, that's been done right?
Possibly it will be setup to be moderated? I'm new here, but not new to forums or running forums. In some cases they can be policed by moderator/admin staff.
Or, maybe it's just a mistake, like maybe there was an upgrade and it changed the permissions.
Oh, and I'm not sure what you guys are talking about, I sent my money first, it's a cashiers check from Washington Mutual, I hope that's okay.
Tired of your Porsche? Buy my old 94 V6 Camaro! I need it so I can afford new tires! Normally I wouldn't accept a trade, but I might be persuaded to make an exception
