20 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHClear Armor question, help....
Leading reported evidence
Check past work, asked around, etc
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Check past work, asked around, etc' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check past work, asked around, etc' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
The new armor was installed on top of the scratches so i cant get to them to rub them out.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
20 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T163944Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Ok, question: I have clear armor on my car. It was just applied. The old was removed due to a very poor install, many fingerprints and stretch marks ect.
So i just get my car back tonight. While looking it over in my garage, i notice many many scratches and ect, from what appears to be the removal of the old armor. The new armor was installed on top of the scratches so i cant get to them to rub them out.
Also, while looking at the front bumper, it appears that they split the armor horizontally across the bumber right below the bumper plugs, from fender to fender. Isn't this supposed to be a one piece install? Not split? It looks like they cut the old with a razor and and matched the new on to it. Is this normal? I am gonna reserve calling up the installer until i get it washed and see what it looks like.
Sounds like your new installers are just a worthless as the first installers. These are questions you should have covered up front with them. Did you? If so, then they need to either 1)refund your $$$ or 2)redo it.
I made sure that my installer was top notch (does all the Porsche dealer cars here under "contract" and even CGT's!). I checked past work, asked around, etc.
In addition, I watched pretty much the entire install so I could alert them of any conflicts between what they were doing and what I wanted. Also wanted to see exacatly how much work goes into a proper install. These guys spent rougly 8 hours on my car!
I have ZERO seams on my entire front GT3 bumper because they did a custom 1-piece install.
Ruh Roh! I would be flippin hot at the dealer right about now!!! The strange thing here in Vegas is that even though they have this company out here do their cars (and add it to the sales invoice) is that they send the cars to the company's shop and will NOT allow them to do the install at the dealer......can sombody say liability.
Yup, if I were you I would be having a nice morning chat with the dealer.
Jim--nice analogy. It is usually just applied to the front bumper, first half of the hood, mirrors, and the rear haunches [if your car has them]. not applied to the entire car.
Cole, Jim is just messin' with you! He knows exactly what a clear bra is and just loves to tout how might he "loves" clear bra's.
Does it ever end Jim??????????
Gosh Dad, I mean Dell, I'm sorry.
I confess. The only bras I'm interested in are the see thru D cup kind. Double D's are OK if you are ever lucky enough find them.
