31 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCoil over's or change the factory shocks?
Leading reported evidence
Install h&r spings
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I installed H&R spings on my 2002 coupe a while ago and have really liked the look and performance of them so far.
Leading evidence: 'Install h&r spings' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'compression and rebound is mismatched' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check of alignment settings, etc' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I installed row 030 on my car recently, and after 450miles, the total lowering is 13mm front, 8mm rear, this on a 99 cab with 39k miles.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
More likely the compression and rebound is mismatched for the aftermarket springs and can cause uncontrolled bounce.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I have a meeting this week for some misc work at the indep Porsche mechanic I use locally and am going to have a check of alignment settings, etc.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I know that coil overs would probably be best, but econimically, would changing my factory shocks to Bilstein's or Koni's improve things?
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
31 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T201111Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I installed H&R spings on my 2002 coupe a while ago and have really liked the look and performance of them so far. Only about 20% of the time do I encounter some roads, that at speed, seem to make the car "bounce" a little more than I like. I understand that any performance springs are not perfectly matched to the OEM shocks. I know that coil overs would probably be best, but econimically, would changing my factory shocks to Bilstein's or Koni's improve things? Car has 33K miles so I would think factory shocks are still ok.
Thanks in advance for you input!
I got mine from Sunset Porsche (board sponor over at Renntech.org) since they offer dealer cost +15%. Mine came out to about $1K shipped. Then another $650 for install and alignment.
An '02 car would do better with the X74, similar price. You are probably experiencing bump steer at high speed as the shocks bottom out, that's why porsche switches out the shocks as well in these setups.
Isn't X74 about double the price of M030? Last time I checked at Suncoast they were advertising M030 for a little over a grand where as X74 is close to $2500.
http://e-partssales.com/Merchant2/me..._Code=996sport
Yes, X74 is about double the price of M030. Question: For those of you that have installed the M030, has it offered a noticable lowered look? My car now has the H&R springs with 18" factory 5-spokes and it looks good. Lowered about 1.5" all around I am thinking of going to 19" wheels so they may fit better with the M030? They say M030 lowers 20mm in front and 10mm in rear. That will porbably not be as low as what I have now.
Interesting thought. Maybe I should just consider changing to Bilstein shocks from the OEM I have now? Perhaps that would work better with the H&R springs?
Yes, that might be the least expensive route.
The row 030 will not lower the car as much as the H&R springs. I installed row 030 on my car recently, and after 450miles, the total lowering is 13mm front, 8mm rear, this on a 99 cab with 39k miles. The initial lowering was 8mm all around. So, if you want to keep the lowered look you currently have, you may want to install the Bilstein HD shocks or Bilstein Sport shocks with your current springs. You could also upgrade your rear sway bar to help reduce understeer.
I am very much impressed with the row 030 package. Understeer is all but eliminated, turn-in is much improved, and overall grip is vastly improved. The tires seem much more efficient with the row 030. Ride is a bit stiff on low speed city streets, but over 45mph or so, it is perfect. The car seems transformed. It's pretty much amazing how much better the car drives and handles now.
I hope my car continues to settle. Another 4 or 5 mm lower in front would be nice. I think I'll go do a bunch of 100-0 braking runs.......
following a bunch of 0-100 acceleration runs of course......
followed by a couple of mountain drives........
followed by
Yeh, I'm curious if your car has settled also.
I asked the tech who did my alignment about settling, and he said yes, it probably would, and that camber would just go a bit more negative.
I'll go measure in a bit and see (then post the results). I have a meeting this week for some misc work at the indep Porsche mechanic I use locally and am going to have a check of alignment settings, etc.
Kevin, here is a before and after of the front right wheel. As you can see the drop is significant. The original standard shocks and springs had 40K miles on them. Now, my RoWM030 shocks and springs have about 3K and 5 track days.
Not to get too technical, but to avoid misleading others, it's worth mentioning that bump steer has nothing to do with the suspension hitting the bump stops:
http://www.racerpartswholesale.com/longtech3.htm
Not misleading. More likely the compression and rebound is mismatched for the aftermarket springs and can cause uncontrolled bounce. Or you could have a bump steer like effect from coil binding, which occurs when you have mismatched (shorter) springs on stock/std shocks. Hit a big enough bump and the coil spring will bind up leaving essentially no spring travel, no bump stop in the world will stop the shocks from bottoming out and sending everything haywire. You see it all the time on ricers as they bounce and shimmy down the highway.
Handles so much better. That floaty feeling at high speed is gone and it performs great on the track. Perfect compromise for those of us that use our cars for both track and street. One day soon I will add a track ***** to the garage but until then I think this is a perfect setup.
Hey Doug! How's it going?
I think we're talking about 2 different things...
If you're saying that the your experience with bump steer will be different with a different spring/shock setup, I agree, because it will change where the wheel will be in it's up and down travel any particular situation.
The point I'm making is that the amount of bump steer that the car has at any given position in the suspension's travel will not change as a result of spring, shock, or sway bar changes. The amount of bump steer has to do with the geometry of the steering rack and suspension arms.
Usually, a street driven car should have very little bump steer, but the article mentions that bump steer can be dialed in for specific handling purposes. On street driven cars, it's annoying to have the car dart in one direction or another as wheels go over bumps or into dips.
Not to sound too stupid...but where can I get more info on the RoW 30 kit and what exactly does it do for/to the car. I don't usually track my car but I do like to run it through the paces when I drive it hard. In my part of the country we have several "trails" with multiple switchbacks and extremly curvy roads....I can't help but think that this kit would improve handling.
Bford100, I had Eibach springs with stock shocks and the car was bouncing like a goat (especially in the track). Changed to Bilstein sports and the car handles very good now. I would suggest just to change the shocks and keep your money for some track days. Bought mine (shocks) from e-bay for $650 or so.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.