12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHI give up what's DE stand for
Leading reported evidence
Test facility"
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Insurance Adjuster, you can plainly see from the picture we weren't "RACING"; instead, we were simply testing the different handling characteristics of the various makes and models at the "testing facility" that day.
Leading evidence: 'Test facility"' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test facility"' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Test facility"
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Insurance Adjuster, you can plainly see from the picture we weren't "RACING"; instead, we were simply testing the different handling characteristics of the various makes and models at the "testing facility" that day.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
The Yanks use it for Drivers Education.
Of course they never have race training or lunatic driving courses as that might be an insurance risk.
However Drivers education is a noble and insurable thing.
There's no racing involved - honest!
I've even been contacted by insurance companies before now, for pictures of cars on DE days that were 'racing' before they had some form of 'incident' that required an insurance pay-out.
Never been able to confim that there was any racing going on...
Just good driver instruction by qualified professionals
Chris.
Yeah, such as here, where I just airbrushed out the guy who was bump drafting (uh-oh, that was a NAStyCAR term . . . sorry) my little 986. Purely, instructional I tell you.
So, Mr. Insurance Adjuster, you can plainly see from the picture we weren't "RACING"; instead, we were simply testing the different handling characteristics of the various makes and models at the "testing facility" that day. With each "hot lap" . . . umm, I mean . . . pass around the controlled driving environment we were presented with various scenarios and given the opportunity to feel (in this controlled environment) how our car would handle such a situation. In this picture you can see I was preparing to learn how to "safely" overtake a slower moving vehicle in front of me. I was just about to take him to the inside . . . umm, I mean . . . wait for a nice straight stretch to turn on my left turn signal and safely overtake him.
There really is a difference. At a DE day you have instructors available to ride with you and drive you if you want. Their expertise and coaching will teach you the fastest line around the course . . . um, I mean . . . how to properly and safely enter and exit a corner and at what speeds you should not drive on the public roadways.
At a track day, that same instructor is probably in the car that just flew past you and will be back on your bumper again if you don't get your head out of the clouds and start picking better lines to carry more speed through your turns. Nobody is there to tell you what you are doing right or doing wrong, you just have to figure it out by what the other cars are doing. Cars passing you = Doing something wrong. You passing cars = Doing something right.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
