27 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH$20k CL 2002 996 in Phx
Leading reported evidence
Check seats
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Check seats' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check seats' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
27 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Taken from the ad:
Paint is Artic silver with purple/pink rims. Purple and pink custom interior. 3.5 motor 6 speed.
Interesting colour choice! Neither a 3.4 nor a 3.6 motor - maybe a hybrid of the two?
"SMOKIN DEAL" Well someone must have been smoking something!! Pink wheels and interior highlights? And a 3.5 engine. At first I thought I must be having a flashback, tell me its not true.
Come on guys, its obviously an overbored 3.4L. It said custom. ...errrr, or maybe when it was built at the factory they mixed up the 3.4 and 3.6 pistons and got half and half. And isn't premium bose an oxymoron?
What guy in their right mind would paint the the rims of any car pink? Let alone what was probably a nice 911 at one point? I guess money doesn't buy taste...
Does the guy that keeps getting arrested for inhaling paint fumes own this car? So, you tear out the interior and switch the wheels and presto, a Porsche again. Purple intake maybe. Talk about bringing down a cars value.
Just go and take a look at the car. If it turns out to be a knock out babe I'm sure your words would change to things like "oh my you really put a personal touch on the car. I'm sure all the guys that see it are jealus a woman owns it." Then as she waddles away the dog in you licks the drool off your lip.
Leather dye and ditch those rims would fix things quick. How to get the smell of a brick sized air odorizer out of the car is another thing. A holiday of drinking beer in the car while racing contry roads would get the proper smell in the car.
