16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHsecond time IMS seal change ...and leaking again
Leading reported evidence
Replace bolt
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I did replaced the bolt for encapsulated NEW ones.
Leading evidence: 'Replace bolt' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check condition of the ims bearing' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
The IMS bearing was in good condition so I replaced the cover and seal.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I took the tranny out for a clutch job 2 months ago, and decided to change the RMS (it was leaking) and to check the condition of the IMS bearing.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
double check which bearing you have IIRC only one style uses the o-ring...
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The factory recommended repair steps might just specify new bolts.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T052503Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I took the tranny out for a clutch job 2 months ago, and decided to change the RMS (it was leaking) and to check the condition of the IMS bearing. The IMS bearing was in good condition so I replaced the cover and seal. After a couple of week I started seeing some small leaks coming from the bottom of the engine. Fearing it could be the RMSI decided to drop the tranny again to check it. The RMS was not leaking but the IMS was. I chaned the seal of the IMS cover again...and now after a couple of weeks it is leaking again. WHAT COULD BE WRONG?? I notice that when I disassembled the IMS, even though I took the chain tensioners out, the IMS bearing was not sitting centered on the case. I had to force the IMS cover to fit into the hole. Might this be the problem?
thanks in advance for your help
What Ivangene said.
To add to it: Did the end plate have a single o-ring or a wider rubber seal with 3 ribs? If the former the end plate should be replaced with a newer updated one with the wider seal with the 3 ribs. Along with the new end plate should come 3 new bolts with their threads treated with some sealer (micro-encapsulated something or other).
Since the bolts thread into holes that are through into the crankcase oil from the crankcase can seep past the threads and around the heads of the bolts and mimic an IMS end plate seal leak. And a bad RMS can mimic a leaking IMS end plate seal leak too, just in case you didn't have enough to think about.
Did you fit the new RMS seal in so the new seal's lip was at the same place as the old seal's? If so this can be a leak source since the oil seal could have -- it is not uncommon -- worn a groove/depression around the crank journal. If the new seal installed right where the old one was the seal will leak. The technique is to install the new seal either a bit deeper -- if room -- or a bit shallower than the orignal seal installed to avoid this.
Even if the end plate the newer one the seal might be compromised and a new seal or perhaps a new end plate with a new seal necessary.
Of course new bolts are needed, properly treated, or at least thoroughly cleaned and re-treated with some proper thread sealer to prevent the oil from seeping past. The factory recommended repair steps might just specify new bolts. There's usually a good reason why fasteners are not reused and sometimes metal fatique ain't it. Sometimes it is the thread treatment that is not reliably duplicated outside of the bolt/fastener factory.
As for having to force the end plate... Not sure I like the sound of that. You certainly could have damaged the seal and caused the leak. If this is all that resulted from your installation of end plate to an out of position IMS consider yourself damn lucky.
One possible course of action would be to remove the tranmission, clean everything up and then remove the RMS and the IMS end plate, but before doing so taking whatever precautions are necessary to ensure the IMS remains in position and the camchains do not experience a change in timing.
Then carefully install a new RMS making sure to not install it where the inner seal lip runs where the old one ran.
Then install a new IMS cover plate, one that has the latest/greatest seal, and of course 3 bolts of with the proper treatment.
Sincerely,
Macster.
what o-ring? you mean the one that goes on the cover? if so, I did twice already. I also install new bolts both times. I the any seal or sealant need for the center nut?
thanks
AWE - I know what "might" be wrong...if you remove the lower tensioner and the ims (sideways one) and still are not centered - MAYBE the upper tensioner is stuck (worn, and not working right) This would cause the IMS center to be towards the drivers side of the hole
what do you think???
ivangene,
I did replaced the bolt for encapsulated NEW ones. Now I have not replaced any o-ring on the center bearing bolt. Actually I did not notice there was an oring there &@#^!@.IMS not being centered, what you are saying is exactly what is happening. The IMS is is towards the driver side. Ho do I solve that?
Thanks a lot
Rgarding the
its a total guess - but you might have to remover the upper tensioner (though normally that is not required) there could be somthing not right with it (or IIRC you had removed the IMS cover without removing the 2 tensioners the first time around - that might have casued the abnormallity)
are you sure that is your leak? it is possible that something else is leaking .....
ivangene,
you are right that I did not remove the tensioner the first time around< what abnormality can this cause...and how do I solve it?
On the leak, I would assume it is the o-ring that I have not replaced. What do you think about that?
thanks
I think you are damn lucky that your cam time didnt jump and you ruin the engine when the vario cams kicked in.
If you didnt replace the "oh" ring. I would say that seems to be a common thing that wasnt changed all 3 times?
Kinda like getting divorced for the 4th time and wondering whats wrong. You gotta look at what the common componant is?
double check which bearing you have IIRC only one style uses the o-ring... not sure but I think the other one has an internal oring on the housing?? someone has to confirm