19 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPanorama Prices
Reported or suspected cause
just now hitting the homes of pca members
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
The month on the front of the issue is usually delivered between the middle and the end of the month that is on the issue......January's issue is just now hitting the homes of PCA members.
Leading evidence: 'just now hitting the homes of pca members' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'just now hitting the homes of pca members' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace lot in 45' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
In this economy, prices can and have changed a LOT in 45 to 60 days.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
just now hitting the homes of pca members
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
The month on the front of the issue is usually delivered between the middle and the end of the month that is on the issue......January's issue is just now hitting the homes of PCA members.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T084359Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I keep noticing that too whenever I receive the new Panorama.
Maybe these folks don't go on the forums and are unaware of what's going on in the marketplace?
I've bought 2 cars through Pano classifieds. Both times, I thought I got a fair (even good) deal. Prices may not be bottom-of-the-barrel but usually one gets a better sense that the seller is a responsible PCA member who has meticulously documented and maintained their car.
In fact, looking at the 996s, prices seem to range from the mid $20s to $40s... what people
here
*hope* their cars are worth!
Seriously though, we all know that listing price frequently doesn't correspond with selling price. At least that's been my experience.
Tim, the lead time and delivery time are really out of whack. The month on the front of the issue is usually delivered between the middle and the end of the month that is on the issue......January's issue is just now hitting the homes of PCA members.
The other problem is that since it's free there is no repercussion to writing an ad that is not in line with the market.
Your ad needs to be in before the 1st of the month before the issue in question. To make the January issue that comes out at the end of Jan, you need to have you ad into them NLT the 1st of December! However, it runs for just the month and if you want it to continue you have to re-submit monthly.
I think most monthly magazines need a similiar lead time to place an ad. Just the nature of the beast when dealing with print. If they didn't make you submit monthly, you'd have a fairly large classified section of cars for sale that have already been sold. I know this from experience of being a region newsletter editor.
As far as prices, my brother found his 997 on a craigslist ad, but after some research, the same car was advertised in Panorama for about $10K more than he paid.
996s in the U.S. are undervalued. For overpriced Porsches see all the 993s for sale on this board. Some of these guys in the RL classified section are truly delusional. They want more for a 993 than a mint condition 2004 Turbo. Uh, no.
