10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHEnd of this week should be an ideal time to order stuff from Gert.
Leading reported evidence
Recommend some informative reading
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
so i'm not gona point fingers atthe french or the EU for now...can u recommend some informative reading on the issue, since it has sparked my curiosity.
End of this week should be an ideal time to order stuff from Gert.
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Recommend some informative reading' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Recommend some informative reading' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Recommend some informative reading
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
so i'm not gona point fingers atthe french or the EU for now...can u recommend some informative reading on the issue, since it has sparked my curiosity.
End of this week should be an ideal time to order stuff from Gert.
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T003124Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
With France voting down the Euro Union Constitution with the Netherlands to follow, the $ should be fairly stronger against the Euro by the end of the week. An ideal time to get Gert's goodies for your 996. Hope this isn't off topic too much.
rofl..funny guy
.
i havn't read up on whats goin on... so i'm not gona point fingers atthe french or the EU for now...can u recommend some informative reading on the issue, since it has sparked my curiosity.
French say firm 'No' to EU treaty
French voters have overwhelmingly rejected the European Union's proposed constitution in a key referendum.
Almost 55% of people voted "No", with 45% in favour. Turnout was high, at about 70%.
The vote could deal a fatal blow to the EU constitution, which needs to be ratified by all 25 member states.
President Jacques Chirac accepted the voters' "sovereign decision", but said it created "a difficult context for the defence of our interests in Europe".
The French leader had campaigned hard for a "Yes" vote.
The BBC's Caroline Wyatt in Paris says the rejection by one of the EU's founding members is a political earthquake, sending reverberations right across Europe.
Winners and losers
European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso described the French rejection as "a very serious problem," but insisted: "We cannot say that the treaty is dead."
But the BBC's world affairs analyst Paul Reynolds says there is no Plan B for the EU and no clear way forward, with moves towards further integration now in doubt.
In his televised address, Mr Chirac said voters had registered their frustrations.
He said he would take a decision on the future of his centre-right government "in the coming days", hinting at a possible reshuffle.
Late on Sunday jubilant "No" supporters gathered at the Place de la Bastille in Paris - where the French Revolution began - chanting "we won" and sounding horns.
Those who rejected the treaty came from across the political spectrum, including Communists, dissident socialists and right-wing parties.
One of the leading right-wing opponents of the treaty, Philippe de Villiers, said: "Europe has to be rebuilt. The constitution is no more."
He urged Mr Chirac either to stand down or dissolve parliament.
The leader of opposition Socialist party Francois Hollande, from the "Yes" campaign, voiced "regret" over the result, but blamed Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin.
"The rejection of this treaty is above all the rejection of the government," he said.
Referendum season
Foreign Minister Michel Barnier said the vote was a "real disappointment" - but urged other EU countries to go ahead with their own votes.
ALREADY RATIFIED TREATY
Austria
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Italy
Lithuania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Member states can ratify the document through a referendum or by parliamentary vote. So far nine countries have formally endorsed it.
Eight national referendums are still to come, including one in the Netherlands on Wednesday, where the "No" side is leading the opinion polls.
Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende called on his fellow Dutch to approve the treaty despite France's rejection.
"There is all the more reason to say 'Yes' so that some progress can be recorded," he said.
In the UK, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said the result raised "profound questions" about the direction of Europe.
The constitution was finalised last year after long negotiations among EU governments.
Its aim is to streamline EU institutions following the admission of 10 new members last year.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/h...pe/4592243.stm
Not so fast, Mr. Greenspan. It is Bush's goal for a week $ to spur our exports. He certainly doesn't care about the European vacation or P car folks buying from Europe. I doubt we will see those halycion days of the $0.95 euro any time soon. (certainly was nice though to get that ROW M030 kit from Gert for less than a grand.)
Bush doesn't control global currency exchange rates. I think it is a fair speculation based on the prospective disintegration of the European Union, since it cannot cohere a Constitution without France. Exchange rates are usually pretty responsive markers. For the U.S., it means not much. For the future of double digit unemployed Europe unable to compete in a global market at price point, it is the death nail. Anyway, order stuff from Gert for your 996 if I turn out to be correct.