fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Need help...Which year?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
19 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHNeed help...Which year?

Leading reported evidence

Replace ; most notable

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

There were like Neil said some changes; most notable to me was the aerodynamics at higher speeds.

Need help...Which year?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace ; most notable' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace ; most notable' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 19 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Replace build quality

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

My friend did not have the full leather, I agree it makes a lot of difference for the aesthetics, but doesn't change the build quality.

Need help...Which year?
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace ; most notable

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

There were like Neil said some changes; most notable to me was the aerodynamics at higher speeds.

Need help...Which year?

Replace build quality

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

My friend did not have the full leather, I agree it makes a lot of difference for the aesthetics, but doesn't change the build quality.

Need help...Which year?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Outcome without a verified action link

i think by the time the 3.6 came along the problem was solved.

No unique explicit quoted action; no causal link assigned

Generation: 20261026T200546Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi all, I am currently looking for a '00 - '01 S.Y. C2 I have driven a '99 so I know what the 3.4 is like, my question is what are your impressions of the 3.6? Which has less inherent probs. Which has a more linear powerband? Which is more responsive? Also If I decide to go with the 3.6 should I get an '01 or '02? Any differences? Thanks for all your help guys, Terrance

POST 2Original post

I was in the same boat a year ago. My research led me to get a 02 or newer if you can swing it. There were a lot of upgrades to the car moter suspension etc. Call you local Porsche dealer and get some advice from the service guys or mananger.

POST 3Original post

I have an 02 and am quite happy with it. There were like Neil said some changes; most notable to me was the aerodynamics at higher speeds. A friend has an 01 and at speeds over 100mph his car starts to feel rather floaty( track driving). At these speeds and higher my car feels as though it hunkers down and is well planted, very stable. The engine differences are 3.4l vs 3.6.Power is a bit up on 02 and newer, noticable but no overwhelming. I feel strongly about the stability of the car on the track if this is your leaning. These are my opinions and are very subjective.I try to provide an unbiased account. I think you will be quite happy with either automobile. Good luck in your search.

POST 4Original post

From the sales '02 brochure: ...headlight system derived from the 911 Turbo. More discreet is the careful reshaping of the front and rear fenders, bumpers and air dam. The result is 25% less lift in the front and 40% less lift at the rear for improved high speed stability.... Reinforcements to the body structure have resulted in a 25% increase in torsional rigidity for crisper response and enhanced agility. The standard 17" wheels weigh almost eight pounds less than the previous design, while the optional 18" wheels are lighter by over 24 pounds. The front air ducts have been reshaped to increase the flow of cooling air to the radiators by 15%" You also get 20 more HP, a glove box, better cup holders and a glass rear window in the cab. I test drove a number of cars and spent a few $$ more for an '02. You could definitely tell the difference when you drive them back to back.

POST 5Original post

not only is the 3.6 higher in HP but, more importanly, it is higher in torque. higher hp you will feel in the top end but more torque you will feel everywhere else, especially in regular driving conditions. with regards to headlamp styling, '02 looking better than pre '02, that's debatable. the '02 restyle was to cater to whiney porsche enthusiasts whining that the headlights came from the boxster. if you like newer looking, get the '02. if you like classic styling get pre '02. [flamesuit on ] if you get pre '02 then find one with full leather option. it makes a huge difference in interior quality. the 3.6s have RMS issues just like 3.4s. the early 3.4s have had engine block porosity problems leading to oil-coolant intermix. i think by the time the 3.6 came along the problem was solved. most importantly, buy the latest model you can afford.

POST 6Original post

There is nothing wrong with a '99-01 3.4 996. There were some problems with early boxster engine porosity, I am not aware of similar issues with the 3.4. These cars are 4-6 years old now so you would think any problems would have already occurred. My 3.4 996 has been very reliable and the car feels very planted at 140+ on the track, I think the RoW M030 helps greatly in this regard. The advantage of the 3.6 is more torque which you can feel coming off the corners on a tight road course. The 3.6 also has Varioram Plus and better breathing heads due to increased valve sizes. Both engines have a very linear powerband and are actually quite reliable. But, both engines have the same integrated dry sump and predisposed to potential oil starvation in certain racing situations, both are prone to RMS issues. Like Carlos said, get the newest Porsche you can. The '02-on also have a real glove box too.

POST 7Original post

Another vote for the 02+. The glove box, rear glass and more HP will help hold its value vs an 01-. My friend had an 01 and I have an 03, there was a significant difference in build quality.

POST 8Original post

rear glass? ya talkin about a cab? does your friend have full leather option? it makes a huge difference.

POST 9Original post

Rear glass for the cab, he didn't specify... My friend did not have the full leather, I agree it makes a lot of difference for the aesthetics, but doesn't change the build quality.

POST 10 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

It looks like the general consenus is to go with the '02 (Or newer) What packages should I get ( Full Leather was mentioned and how can I tell) I NEED the Crest on the steering wheel so what package is that and finally should I search for a factory Aero or buy aftermarket? What are the differences? Somebody in here has the exact car I am looking for I will try to find a link. Thanks again guys! But he seats need to be stitched in yellow also.

POST 12 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

HAHAHA GOOD EYE...and no...MUST be 6sp.!

POST 13Original post

If you want to track a lot a 99 is a good option due to slightly lower weight and optional LSD on C2s due to traction control instead of PSM. I believe the only 3.6L 996 you can get with LSD and PSM is the 40th anniversary. The interior is definitely nicer on the 02+ and 20 extra HP is always a benefit. As far as must have options I would get full leather, PSE, sport suspension, and one of the upgraded stereo packages. Good luck in your search!

POST 16Original post

lol, good one. Porsche Sport Exhaust. factory installed it has a cutout switch to make it quiet. can be wired/plumed if not factory equipped but i don't think it's worth the effort, especially for coupes.

POST 17 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

How can you tell by looking?

POST 18Original post

PSE - Porsche Sport Exhaust. Its easy to add if the car doesn't have it but it will cost you $1500 + install so its nice to find a car that already has it.

POST 19Original post

Your pictures above are a 99-01 with the factory Aerokit option. Works for me.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.