22 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHI got in too deep!!!!
Leading reported evidence
Check ol "policies and proceedures" manual
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I guess I really should have checked the ol "policies and proceedures" manual!
Leading evidence: 'Check ol "policies and proceedures" manual' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check ol "policies and proceedures" manual' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
22 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T172408Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Here's my problem. i have a factory rebuilt X51 motor, and no longer have a car to put it into.
So if anyone is interested, I have to get rid of it.
It's a 3.6 05 X-51 motor. Part # was 996-100-955-CX when I got it, I'm not sure if that's still the number. it cost well over $9500.00
Make me a respectable offer, and it's yours!
With all due respect, may I suggest you first become a respectable paying member before you post an ad asking for respectable offers? You are breaking forum rules.
Also, if you want people to bid for your engine, I suggest you try eBay instead. I hate it when people try to start bidding wars between Rennlist members -- if you're selling something on Rennlist, name your price and first come first serve.
with all due respect. I have just paid for my membership. also, I thought it would be nice to offer it to fellow board members, soory if I was trying to be considerate,
Forum rules state that you must be a member and must post a price, your avatar shows "user" and you did not state a price at first. It was a reminder to the forum rules, and honestly, much more polite than others on this board.
That said, you resolved both, best of luck with the sale, sounds like a good deal.
Yup - programmatore was actually pretty nice about it. I had already reported you to the admins to delete your post.
It's still early and to be honest I couldn't be bothered wasting words that would invariably have chewed you out for trying to sell something without being a member.
While you membership is being validated, so I do not need to get on to you about the rules of FS items, where are you located, when was the engine rebuilt, do you have the original documentation of the engine, pictures, etc.?
I do apologize for my screw up. I guess I really should have checked the ol "policies and proceedures" manual! (just kidding). The motor was purchased from PCNA in july of 2006 It has never been installed, and is currently on an engine stand in my shop. I'll get pictures on monday if you like.
Here's a link to the thread where you can ask for assistance with getting your membership corrected so that it shows-up on this thread:
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...ferrerid=54027
