14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHJust got rear ended
Reported or suspected cause
rear deck and bumper and amounted
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
It was the rear deck and bumper and amounted to about $10k (these cars are not cheap either).
Leading evidence: 'rear deck and bumper and amounted' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'rear deck and bumper and amounted' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace which seems most likely, will this impact resale' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
The issue is when it is reported by the insurance company that will appear in carfax, etc, and is discoverable by a potential buyer.
Outcome qualification: Negation, uncertainty or missing explicit repair resolution overrides the raw extraction signal.
Replace which seems most likely, will this impact resale
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
If it is just a rear bumper change which seems most likely, will this impact resale that drastically?
Outcome qualification: Negation, uncertainty or missing explicit repair resolution overrides the raw extraction signal.
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 1 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Just got rear ended tonight by a Jeep Grand Cherokee. He hit me going about 10 mph and did some cracking to the rear bumper.
Any ideas how much the rear bumper will be to replace as well as other things I should have them check to make sure no other damage was done?
I plan to get an estimate from Auto Gallery in Woodland Hills tomorrow. Anyone have bad experiences with them? Thanks for the help, not looking forward to being without the car while they service it
As long as they hit you, go to the Porsche dealer and have them check it thoroughly and fix it. In OR, you are also entitled to "diminished value" compensation for the impact of the crash on your resale value. I'm not saying you should stick it to the person who hit you, but you need to make sure all your damages are covered and discovered.
Is the diminished value something that I need to estimate, or is this a figure the dealer can provide me with? If it is just a rear bumper change which seems most likely, will this impact resale that drastically? Thanks for the help I really appreciate it!
I don't know about CA, but in OR the dealer and the insurance co. figure it out together. In my case, I got rear-ended in my M3. It was the rear deck and bumper and amounted to about $10k (these cars are not cheap either). I got about $2k in dim value as I recall. The issue is when it is reported by the insurance company that will appear in carfax, etc, and is discoverable by a potential buyer.
Thanks for taking the time to explain this to me, I really apprecaite it. I will definitely inquire about it tomorrow at the dealership. Fortunately the car is under a lease, so I am hedged against any adverse effects to the value. But whatever I am entitled to, I will defintiely seek to recover.
I'm not sure you are owed anything under the terms of a "lease" whereas Diminished Value is concerned. I would ask the dealer about that. If you end up owing the negative equity because of the accident at the end of your lease, you most definitely neet to inquire of HIS insurance company to pay it out to you. You will need to hire a appraiser to come out and look at your car. I just got a judgement for my accident for five figures. (Oh yeah!!) And I am in California as well. What they do is rate the value of your car before and after now that it has been in an accident. Because you will take a hit with regard to value, it is owed to you. So, absolutely get what is due you. And don't back down, they will try to fight you on it...stand your ground.
