28 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNeed input on 2001 996
Leading reported evidence
Test color-blindness, specifically, red/green deficiency
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I think your first step is to get the wife tested for color-blindness, specifically, red/green deficiency.
Leading evidence: 'Test color-blindness, specifically, red/green deficiency' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'just removing all the woodgrain would suffice' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Test color-blindness, specifically, red/green deficiency' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
I suspect just removing all the woodgrain would suffice.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
28 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
As the title says, I found an 'interesting' color 2001 996 Turbo on the 'bay :
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Porsc...fCarsQ5fTrucks
My wife loves the color and says that we should go for it...The car is across the country from us, so it would be a purchase without a drive...
Any information would be greatly appreciated! Looking for thoughts on what it might need, are there any well known problems that I should expect, etc...
Thanks in advance!
It's Back -
been around a while... looks like same pics about a year later, still not sold ?? or new owner wanted black and "thought" he could live with it
Yes, this one has been around for a while.
If only they had put more of a standard color interior in it, it might have been a little bit more acceptable.
I'm sure it's a great car to drive, but wow... that color...
It's Nephrite green interior.... and looking at it truly makes me a little sick to my stomach.
I once new a guy who ordered a brand new Caddy Sedan Deville in the early
90's that was butternut yellow exterior, butternut yellow interior, with a Navy blue custom fabric top.
I am sure he still has that car for the same reason that this car is for sale.
+1 for Ferd - its a hell of a car and a good price, I bet with some effort the interior could be replaced with someone's track build.....the car is very low miles and in great condition despite the color
the old stuff might not sell with $0.01 auctions though
how many of these could there be
I love the crossed out option codes under the hood. The guys in the factory were like.....4308 right?? NO ??? OMG he wants WHAT ???
OOOOOOOO Kay - -
lol
My parents had a 64 Impala, I think the interior was the same color.
For less money look here:
http://www.luxurycars.com/searchview.php?ID=p1686151
Just can't stand yellow and miles are high.
