18 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHO2 sensors.. How hard can it be?
Leading reported evidence
Clean maf today and also found rubber oil ring seal
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
UPDATE: Cleaned the MAF today and also found rubber oil ring seal on inside of oil fill cap out of position.
Leading evidence: 'Clean maf today and also found rubber oil ring seal' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean area where you applied it' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
They won't be that tight unless they were installed incorrectly.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I used electronic cleaner, I use it on my circuit boards at work worth $80K a pop - safe for MAF.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Personally, I use a little anti-seize on O2 sensors.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I can't tell if the signal is getting to the ECM in the correct way or amount of time for it to make proper adjustments to the fuel/air mixtures but I'm now leaning towards the suggestion of cleaning the MAF first and driving it after to see what happens.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I once went through replacing O2 sensors in a 4runner only to find out it was the MAF throwning off the amount of fuel being injected resulting in a bad reading at the O2 sensor.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
18 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T161109Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm 'chanelling' Jeremy from Top Gear when he says 'How hard can it be...' and of course - something blows up or crashes right after he says this.
I've got two codes; P0130 and P0150 and both are the O2 sensors ahead of the cats. I've had it before - last spring and cleared the CEL and it didn't come back until yesterday. Reading up on these things it says expect them to go bad with high mileage and sometimes they get dirty and the signals to the ECU slow down to the point where the system 'guesses' on fuel/air settings.
I've have had warm up issues with the RPM hunting around until the temps come up and have been living with it. The codes say it looks like it runs too rich. I've cleared the codes so we'll see what happens in a few days but I know this issue is going to come back, so...
I'll most likely replace both of them. 'How hard can it be'?
Will I find these things screwed in so tight after the car has gone over 100Km's that I won't be able to budge them? Risk of snapping one off? I've seen a special socket or wrench - a 22M - that you can buy. Isn't there enough room for a normal 22M wrench? The Bosch part at Pelican is $124.00 each. A bit pricy but it is what it is and if they have lasted this long then it's not bad value I guess. If I get the rear of the car off the ground is this a slide under and reach up DIY or do I need to rent time on a hoist?
Both of them reading bad at the same time suggests that the problem may be upstream. I'd try to clean the MAF first. I once went through replacing O2 sensors in a 4runner only to find out it was the MAF throwning off the amount of fuel being injected resulting in a bad reading at the O2 sensor. If one sensor was doing this on it's own it would be another story.
I just had my cats off my car. It will take you about 15 minutes to remove the back bumper. You do not need to jack the car up. Apply a liberal amount of penetrating oil to the O2 sensor/exhaust bung.
You might be able to remove the O2 sensors with the bumper in place, but it sure does make getting to them way easier.
Take off the cat sections and save yourself a lot of grief. A little PB Blaster, and you're all set. Make sure to label your pre- and post- cat wires before you unplug them
More Pics
Thanks for all the tip's guys. I'll try the 'easy' fix first - cleaning the MAF. No harm no foul if it doesn't work, right? <Well unless I drown the thing in too much fluid it can't hurt!> One quick question. Do I use anti-seize on the O2 new threads? <I know, less is more>
Personally, I use a little anti-seize on O2 sensors. Not that it'll last - it'll get burned off, but giving the threads a little lubrication to start is a good thing.
Connector terminals are different color between pre and post (grey and black, I think). So as long as you match the color you will be good.
Rick
99 996C4
87 944S
I did use a little anti-seize; see pics. If your cats
are
bad; I have a spare OEM set; PM me if needed. And re: plugs; they look the same to me, except for the color of course. It was my first time messing with them, so I labeled to be the extra safe
Wouldn't I have a failure of the downstream O2's - after the cat's? The codes I'm getting are for the O2's ahead of the cats. I find it suspicious that both sensors fail at the exact same time. It if were age related... it doesn't make sense. The real time volt numbers were both going up and down depending on the RPM I was putting into the car. Each bank sensor would go off scale 0 and then increase to say 0.9V as I rev'ed the car. They were not exactly the same volts each at any given point but it appeared that they were working somewhat. I can't tell if the signal is getting to the ECM in the correct way or amount of time for it to make proper adjustments to the fuel/air mixtures but I'm now leaning towards the suggestion of cleaning the MAF first and driving it after to see what happens. I will get to it next week as I'm at the track this weekend so it will have to sit in the garage until I get back on Monday.
I took one of the O2 sensors off mine with just an open end wrench. Just bump the wrench with your hand like an impact wrench and as long as it doesn't slip, it shouldn't be that hard to remove. Mine had over 100k miles at the time so if it was going to be stuck in there, it was then. I didn't remove any parts to get to it except the airbox. The hardest thing for me was snaking the wires in and out the proper way.
UPDATE: Cleaned the MAF today and also found rubber oil ring seal on inside of oil fill cap out of position. Cleared codes and went on a drive twice today and NO codes in ECU and No CEL. So it was either a dirty MAF or an air leak through the oil cap, (or both). Tah Dah!
You should not use penetrating oil around the sensors. They won't be that tight unless they were installed incorrectly.
If you want to use penetrating oil be sure to thoroughly clean the area where you applied it to remove all traces of this stuff. If any remains it can ruin the new sensors. Applying to any old sensors ruins them even if they would have been otherwise ok.
Sincerely,
Macster.