fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Vacuum Leak?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHVacuum Leak?

Leading reported evidence

Adjust more negative than bank 2

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

And yes my scanner reads both the STFT and LTFT on both banks and bank 1 is adjusted more negative than bank 2.

Vacuum Leak?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Adjust more negative than bank 2' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust more negative than bank 2' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 8 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 4 other evidence results

Test have around 1.4

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

1v seems pretty low to me as all the cars I've tested have around 1.4 when operating properly.

Vacuum Leak?

Check maf voltage and sensed airflow

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If you still have the scanner check your maf voltage and sensed airflow.

Vacuum Leak?

Replace especially considering the fact

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I imagine it would take a while for the numbers to reflect a change, especially considering the fact that the adaption isnt far enough out of range to set a DTC.

Vacuum Leak?

Run 's fne

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Recently (3 - 4 months) my idle has been rough, although the car run's fne.

Vacuum Leak?
Frequently discussed actions (6)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Adjust more negative than bank 2

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

And yes my scanner reads both the STFT and LTFT on both banks and bank 1 is adjusted more negative than bank 2.

Vacuum Leak?

Check maf voltage and sensed airflow

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If you still have the scanner check your maf voltage and sensed airflow.

Vacuum Leak?

Replace especially considering the fact

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I imagine it would take a while for the numbers to reflect a change, especially considering the fact that the adaption isnt far enough out of range to set a DTC.

Vacuum Leak?

Run 's fne

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Recently (3 - 4 months) my idle has been rough, although the car run's fne.

Vacuum Leak?

Set dtc

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I imagine it would take a while for the numbers to reflect a change, especially considering the fact that the adaption isnt far enough out of range to set a DTC.

Vacuum Leak?

Test have around 1.4

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

1v seems pretty low to me as all the cars I've tested have around 1.4 when operating properly.

Vacuum Leak?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Outcome without a verified action link

I never put the injectors back to whrere they were, so it's been at least 2 months and 2500 miles and no change.

No unique explicit quoted action; no causal link assigned

Generation: 20261027T175704Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

I have a 99 C2 that has always run well. Recently (3 - 4 months) my idle has been rough, although the car run's fne. I hooked up an OBD2 scanner and see that O2 sensors are fine and that both after Cat sensors are balanced. I have a vacuum of 15 at idle. NO DTC's or CEL. The scanner shows an unbalance in fuel trim between bank 1 and bank 2. Bank 1 is consistantly 7 - 10 percentage points more negative than Bank 2. For instance: Bank 1's long term fuel trim reads -15% and Bank 2's reads -5. I suspect that I might have a small vacuum leak effecting bank 1 causing the bank to run rich, but not rich enough to cause the O2 sensors to have to go out of range to adjust. Is there any connection, hose, etc, on Bank one that could cause a vacuum leak that would only effect that bank? I am just guessing, so any other ideas are very welcome.

POST 2Original post

If you still have the scanner check your maf voltage and sensed airflow. You should have about 1.4-1.5 Vs at the MAF sensor and at idle with no consumers, about 14 grams per second of air (this from a known good car at an altitude of 1500 feet, so i dont know how that will affect you.

POST 3Original post

MAF reads just under 1 on a warm engine. This is the same reading I have always had. Wouldn't a bad MAF effect both banks anyway?

POST 4Original post

1v seems pretty low to me as all the cars I've tested have around 1.4 when operating properly. Anyways its wierd to see mixture adaption refered to in short term and long term as Porsche doesnt use that system or those terms. Im not sure if your generic (I'm assuming, unless you popped 4gs for a PST2) scanner is relabeling TRA's and FRA's as STFT and LTFT. Anyways, the way I read those numbers, one bank being more negative than the other, is that the o2 sensor in that bank is seeing a richer exhuast mixture, therefore your DME is subtracting fuel on that bank to keep the mixture where it had it. A vacuum leak would mean more air in the exhuast (lean mixture) so the DME would be adding fuel in that case. If that were the case, never having seen the car or the readouts from the DME, you might have a leaking intake distributor on that bank. I think in this case though (judging from your numbers, one side being more negative than the other) you might have a problem with a fuel injector. Thats the only thing I can think of that would affect only one bank in the manner you describe.

POST 5Original post

Thanks for your help, but what is a intake distributor? And yes my scanner reads both the STFT and LTFT on both banks and bank 1 is adjusted more negative than bank 2. Ihave switched the injectors from bank 1 with bank 2 and the difference stayed the same, so I am guessing it is nit a fuel injector Thanks.

POST 6Original post

Intake distributor/ intake manifold How long did you drive the car for with the injectors switched? Did you switch all the injectors from bank one over to bank two? I imagine it would take a while for the numbers to reflect a change, especially considering the fact that the adaption isnt far enough out of range to set a DTC. Perhaps something is only slightly out of spec and it wouldnt immediately cause the other side to start taking away fuel.

POST 7Original post

I never put the injectors back to whrere they were, so it's been at least 2 months and 2500 miles and no change. I appreciate you thinking about it. I can reset the computer and within 30 minutes if driving, the LTFT is back tp those number mentioned above.

POST 8Original post

Hmm. Have you tried swapping the o2 sensors from bank to bank and seeing if the mixture adaption changes? Desribe your rough idle, is it just like a shake or does the idle bounce up and down. What RPM are you idling at. IIRC, you should be at around 700 rpm on a warm engine and 820 with the AC switched on. Im kind of grasping at straws right now but its kind of fun, heh.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.