26 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHGood Morning...
Leading reported evidence
Fill tank in the dark
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Fill tank in the dark' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Fill tank in the dark' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
26 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T154520Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
????
good morning = new seats that I have not even driven in yet.... THAT is a good morning... not dropping a pipano on my car
(didnt watch the vid, but think I have seen it B4)
I prefer this to wake up too and start the long weekend
And here I've been giving you $hit about your gas tank.
Thank you for what you do! Want me to come out with some fellow RL'sters and fix it? I'd be willing to fill your tank in the dark
Clarkson is a complete ***, pre 74 911s are getting hard to find. That guy hates everything German and Porsche. He's been in trouble a few time for his German quips on the show. And then when they challenge DMAX in that one episode, they have to cheat to win. At least Hammond and May are Porsche guys. Although I think he has the hots for Sabine Schmitz
.
At first when I started watching the show I liked him the best of the presenters and I thought James was a dweeb. I now actually find James quite amusing and has quite the dry sense of humor. Clarkson is just obnoxious. ...But I never miss an episode.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
