11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHconvertable tops - life span & other questions
Leading reported evidence
Install by an upholstery shop
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I�m considering the options of getting a new window installed by an upholstery shop for ~$500, or getting a new top for 1450.
Leading evidence: 'Install by an upholstery shop' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install by an upholstery shop' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
But I don't think he made much profit on this job because he basically replaced 2 covers for the price of one.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The top itself was starting to show wear so I replaced the whole thing.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
If you don't mind going to Gaithersburg to get yours repaired, PM me for contact info of the upholstry shop I talked to.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
It hurt having to cough-up $1600 to replace a top in good condition (aside from the unglued rear window) but the new color scheme takes the sting away.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T113718Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hey there
My plastic rear window is separating from the top on MY01. I�m considering the options of getting a new window installed by an upholstery shop for ~$500, or getting a new top for 1450. Since my top is in very good condition & car is garaged with low miles I normally wouldn�t consider a new one, but (according to some old threads about this topic) the average life span of a convertible top is only 6 to 9 years. If the top really needs replacing in a few years, I�d bite the bullet and do it now�maybe even get the glass window.
Does anyone know what goes wrong with these tops requiring replacement (aside from crummy rear plastic window design)?
Can I get the top �serviced� and try to determine remaining useful life?
If I get a new top, would a 7-year-old top in good condition (aside from blown rear window) have any resale value?
thanks for your opinions
Join the club. That makes 3 of us in the same area. I can't tell if my top is going bad, I mean it doesn't leak nor have any rips in it. $1450 is a pretty good price, I was quoted $1800+.
Evidently their was a TSB about this problem in 2004 so it's not surprising lots of people have this problem - just annoying.
If you don't mind going to Gaithersburg to get yours repaired, PM me for contact info of the upholstry shop I talked to. My indie recommended them highly.
if you plan on keeping the car for a long time, i would suggest replacing the entire top and get one with the glass insert. if not keeping the car take it to a good upholstery shop and get the plastic replaced. that's what i did and sold the car a year later. one of the problems that i had on my 01, is that the seals started to give resulting in small leaks. the dealer tried to fix with new seals, but did not have much success.
Porsche now makes a top with the rear window sewn in from the factory, but it lists for $3800 +installation. After 3 unsuccessful attempts (by a dealer with experience) at installing a brand new window in a brand new top on my cab, I am now getting the factory sewn in top. I think the best you will do with an upholstery shop is have them sew in a window from the outside, and it looks rather bad in my opinion. Try a search on some of my recent posts on the topic...
I replaced my 00 top after in 2007. My window came unglued and needed replacement. The top itself was starting to show wear so I replaced the whole thing. $1450 isn't bad. I paid about $200 more.
You might consider choosing a different color top than you had before. It gives your car a new custom look. If you change colors, make sure they include the upholstry that covers the rear deck so it all matches.
Also, make sure you get a warranty from the installer. After the new cover was installed, there were problems with the liner. The installer had to take it off, order a new top and install the new one. That's a lot of labor! Ask your installer what their policy is for problems like that. My guy did it at no charge because he's a good guy. But I don't think he made much profit on this job because he basically replaced 2 covers for the price of one. He gets all my referrals in Northern California though! Alex is the best!
Just had mine replaced and went from black to a beautiful dark blue color.
It hurt having to cough-up $1600 to replace a top in good condition (aside from the unglued rear window) but the new color scheme takes the sting away.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
