Rennlist

Caught by Lidar detector

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHCaught by Lidar detector

Leading reported evidence

Check with a couple of traffic lawyers

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
Nonetheless, I would still check with a couple of traffic lawyers to see what they say.
Original post Read captured discussion
Caught by Lidar detector

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Check with a couple of traffic lawyers' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check with a couple of traffic lawyers' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check with a couple of traffic lawyers

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
Nonetheless, I would still check with a couple of traffic lawyers to see what they say.
Original post Read captured discussion
Caught by Lidar detector

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T144324Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Driving over the Verrazano Bridge Sat morn @ 75mph in a 45 zone my detector was in my other car and I was caught by lidar. Is there any way to fight this? I thought I saw a post not too long ago about a published report on the inaccuracy of lidar. Can anyone help.

POST 2Original post

NY moving violation tkt will be 2 points on NJ lic.

POST 3Original post

Here's an interesting thread on what you might try: http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/about5923.html

POST 4Original post

Since that was in NYC, it goes to the traffic violations adjudication bureau (or something with a similar name). Unfortunately, that means no prosecutor to plea bargain with, as you could in Nassau County. Nonetheless, I would still check with a couple of traffic lawyers to see what they say.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.