8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHTrying to compile engine failures information
Leading reported evidence
Replace r&d
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Many of the early M96 motors were not replaced to failure but just replaced for R&D on the RMS leak.
Leading evidence: 'Replace r&d' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace r&d' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Class action is where attorneys use a large class that were wronged to make millions.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T013556Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
In Soloporsche.com spanish forum we are trying to compile information as much as possible.
A spaniard car magazine is going to publish a press file so if you'd like to help us, you could write any data about your engine failure in our English spoken international Soloporsche forum:
http://www.soloporsche.com/showthread.php?t=35692
we'll be very pleased to received your post with car, model year, mileage, etc
Thanks in advance
Joaquin
One more parameter you should collect is "replacement" versus failure. Many of the early M96 motors were not replaced to failure but just replaced for R&D on the RMS leak.
There's a guy here in Ontario that has an ad running in our local Kijji for data from M96 owners (he says Boxster owners & IMS issues) as he wants to start a class action lawsuit against Porsche in Canadian courts.
http://toronto.kijiji.ca/c-services-...AdIdZ182529621
He's been trying this for quite a while, through various means. It seems to me that if nobody has nailed Porsche in the US, where contingency fees are common practice it ain't gonna happen in little old Ontario, where you still have to write a cheque if you want to sue someone.
I know It will be impossible, but we are trying to show this problems to everybody thanks to a magazine. In Spain car magazines have not vey good quality reports and It's rare to find any of them claiming against a manufacturer.
Thanks for the link
I've been involved in many class action lawsuits over the last several years. I have yet to see a penny. Class action is where attorneys use a large class that were wronged to make millions.
Anyone in the know care to respond?
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
