15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHwow a 2000 evo SC on ebay
Leading reported evidence
Replace multiple times - judging by mileage
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
that car is from Louisiana and had tranny and RMS replaced multiple times - judging by mileage, it's probably due again
Leading evidence: 'Replace multiple times - judging by mileage' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace multiple times - judging by mileage' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T192637Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Do you know where this car came from? This looks like one I looked at from Nevada over a year ago but then the guy had a GT3 emblem on the back...but it was SC'd and had the same tan interior...but only 8K miles on it. Anyone run a carfax on it? If it's the same car, it's had some serious track time on it.
The mileage and the seat wear don't match in my book. I think the wheels are no name but am not sure, and it's the wrong wing for the car. It's also a full leather vehicle which is nice though. They want $37K for it, and what does a low mileage 2000 MY 996 go for these days? I'm guessing mid 20's? You could buy the 3.4 superchager currently on ebay and get it installed for probably $7K all in and drop it into a car you buy locally and can trust. I'd call it an average deal but would worry about the cars past.
That wing looks great on that car... but I like correct year kits. Maybe this is a new engine. Though savanah beige has a tendency to get dirty fast if you dont clean it often... this car might be all original.
There's probably nothing wrong with it. But I mentioned the seats, they don't look like 18K miles seats to me, and Chuck thought it looked like a track car he's seen before. Unfortunately they don't give detailed pictures of the exterior to shown any scratches or nicks, etc. They're all kind of from far away. It's a good looking car that has some expensive options and add ons, but it also has a pretty premium price. With a PPI it could be a nice turn key car for someone.
Add to that list Houston, Galveston, etc.. (any coastal or near coastal town) - too many chances it's been affected by weather
Yes, I clicked the Carfax report and read about the trans. and RMS
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
