17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWhich is correct, and why??
Leading reported evidence
Use 996, i would
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If you don't want to use 996, I would use the term 911....Carrera is the "model" kind of like saying you have a Honda Accord EX....you wouldn't tell people you have an "EX", you would tell people you have an Accord.....sorry for the Honda example, it is all I could think of to demonstrate the point
Leading evidence: 'Use 996, i would' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use 996, i would' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Use 996, i would
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If you don't want to use 996, I would use the term 911....Carrera is the "model" kind of like saying you have a Honda Accord EX....you wouldn't tell people you have an "EX", you would tell people you have an Accord.....sorry for the Honda example, it is all I could think of to demonstrate the point
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T205155Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I would say "996"...it gives you the chance to show people that you are a Porsche guy and will lead to more questions about your car
If you don't want to use 996, I would use the term 911....Carrera is the "model" kind of like saying you have a Honda Accord EX....you wouldn't tell people you have an "EX", you would tell people you have an Accord.....sorry for the Honda example, it is all I could think of to demonstrate the point
I would say
It's a Porsche 911 Carerra
Its sounds good and pronounce Porsche like Porsha, this identifies it properly. 996 is the internal code for the 911 body style during 1999-2006.
I wouldn't bother telling them about 996 unless they start asking questions like oh my brothers friend had a 993 is that the same thing. Then I go into explaining the model numbers.
I am asked the same question numerous times by the "ricer" kids.
I respond by saying "996" then going into a little history of Porsche. They are always inquisitive in what I have to say and it leaves a good door to talk to them in a personal level instead of having them stereotype me as snobish. I usually reciprocate the intrest in their cars and if anything, promote the importance of driving safe.
PHP Code:
rval_1999
:
but why are ther two names
for
the car
,
one of which is not
"written"
on the car anywhere
????
rval: Not entirely true. In my car's case (the 40th Anniversary edition) as well as the Millenium edition, there is no "Carrera" badge on the rear lid. These cars have a "911" badge. So I would agree completely to jumper5836's response.
I removed the "carrera" rear deck lid badge and replaced it with the anniversary "911" badge for two reasons. The chrome badge was more noticeable, and most people have no clue what the carrera means. I just tell them its a 911 , unless you want to get into a lengthy dialog about the history of the car and the Pan American Carrera races for which the car is named after.
OK you think this is a hard question, I roll alot with one of my good ol buddys, and he has a 1996 993 c4s, you should see the perplex look on people faces , when they ask " what kind of cars are those" we both say 911 and the we need to get into the entire history of the 911. Its very funny some times to see some of them just don't get it. Ok back to the question i say its a 911..
"What kind of car" to me connotes what "make"...just tell them its a Porsche which is the make. Model numbers, esp. Porsche model numbers can be confusing to those that aren't familiar with the marque.
Who even has to ask "what kind of car is that?. I swear you could practically take a neanderthal and he would know what a 911 is. Its practically the most easily recognized car in the world. Even if they dont know its a 911 they would almost certainly know its Porsche.
At generic car shows I'm always amazed at how many people have to bend over and look at the badge on the front to find out what make the car is (I'm not in Ca). And the guys that walk down the isle and point it out as a Porsche seem pretty proud of them selves because they know what it is.
After introducing the 911 in the 60s, that name has become synonymous with Porsche. Although Porsche has introduced other models, the 911 is the only one that many people look at as being a true Porsche.
For all but the people on this or similiar boards, the 996, C2, C4, and S terminology is meaningless. Say "911" unless you get a tt. Then say "Porsche twin turbo" which nobody will confuse with a Cayanne.
To me it's kind of like somebody asking about your kids, and going into a long explanation about an ancient divorce, step-children, and half-brothers. "Fine" is the answer they want. I didn't know any thing about 964, 993, 996 etc until I got a 1990C4 and visited this site and had to figure out where I belonged. AS
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.