14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHFinally, pics
Leading reported evidence
Use 50 1.4 lens
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I had to use my 50 1.4 lens because the lighting wouldn't allow me to use anything slower and with one flash I couldn't get any decent bouncing...but the too long for the situation focal length did give me a chance to have some fun with it.
Leading evidence: 'Use 50 1.4 lens' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use 50 1.4 lens' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I had to use my 50 1.4 lens because the lighting wouldn't allow me to use anything slower and with one flash I couldn't get any decent bouncing...but the too long for the situation focal length did give me a chance to have some fun with it.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Use 50 1.4 lens
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I had to use my 50 1.4 lens because the lighting wouldn't allow me to use anything slower and with one flash I couldn't get any decent bouncing...but the too long for the situation focal length did give me a chance to have some fun with it.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I had to use my 50 1.4 lens because the lighting wouldn't allow me to use anything slower and with one flash I couldn't get any decent bouncing...but the too long for the situation focal length did give me a chance to have some fun with it.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T031046Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Well, the last time I was home I couldn't take pictures because before I had a chance to wash the car the coolant tank sprung a leak and by the time it was fixed I was back at school. I almost didn't this time either because it's night, the car is in the garage, and now that it's washed we don't want to drive it until my bro gets home tomorrow night. I had to use my 50 1.4 lens because the lighting wouldn't allow me to use anything slower and with one flash I couldn't get any decent bouncing...but the too long for the situation focal length did give me a chance to have some fun with it.
Wish I had more light so that I could stop down the lens more on that one...and no I don't have pink skin...multiple light sources were killing me...car interior is metropol blue and my skin is tanned...so yeah, colors are not accurate (ext. is artic silver btw)
Thanks
They're deerskins (
www.wheelskins.com)
. I got them from bavauto, though many places sell them, some at better prices than others. These are the best I've found, including the ones I looked at at what must have been a dozen glove shops in rome and florence. They do enhance the whole driving experience, though they go better with cars that don't have leather steering wheels (my personal car is 20 years old thus has a plastic - albeit it soft plastic - steering wheel).
The dunhill ones, on the website anyways, look like the limited edition Jim Clark gloves griots garage sold a while back. The Jim Clark ones felt more like baseball gloves to me than driving gloves, and from the looks of it the dunhill ones might be the same way.
wow man, coming from you that means something...not sure if I prefer your models or my model though
www.davidson.smugmug.com
btw...might as well give myself a plug...where in the world is place to enter in a signature? I can't find it anywhere in the user CP.
I prefer your model....screw the other ones...they are a necessary evil to be able to affort our models!
I am not very good in shooting our models!!! Our models are only looking good when driven...okay I love to watch mine just sitting in the garage!!
marlin, you have to be a paid member to have a signature. Nice pics, though - you have a very good eye. I wish I had the eye for pictures like that. Mine end up looking so blah.
Yes, I agree, screw your models...if only they would let me
Sigs only for paying members eh...well...I'll become a paying member when I can afford my own Porsche I suppose.
It's all in applying unsharp mask with the settings 20% 50px 0 threshold as a final step (with some modifications for subject matter, with people I do like 13% and 35px otherwise their pupil takes over their eye.
with your brothers P...they don't it isn't yours...they probably would let you!!! MMMMHHHH maybe not!
The respectable goodlooking your females....only hangin' out with metropolitan men! LA and NYC....
