10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHScratched paint
Leading reported evidence
Use 996s
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
There are a lot of quality used 996s on the market at that price point without such a problem.
Leading evidence: 'Use 996s' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use 996s' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T100758Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Looked at a 99 yesterday, and while the price seemed in the ball park (about $40k for 32k mi), I noticed a lot of fine scratches in the paint. As if it was driven by a bush a little too close.
Can anyone give me a ballpark figure for getting rid of these? It looked like they were mainly on the sides, but I'd probably just have the whole body done.
And if you think $40k is too high, I should mention that it's from a dealer, and is CPO with a 2yr/100k warranty.
Thanks.
tom
I doubt anyone can give you agood reliable figure online. You simply must take it to a body shop you trust or a high end detailer to evaluate the scratches and determine a cost or how best to address them. Having said that, you would probably be surprised how much will come out during a quality detailing job. Good luck.
You have to take it to a bodyshop, but I'm guessing they are the kind of thing that will need wetsanding to get rid of and that will probably run you about $400-500 on a Porsche sized car in most places, and $700 in long island.
Usually a good detailer can buff out scratches as long as they are not too deep. Hard to tell without seeing them. Do you have any pictures?
You should be able to buy the car a little cheaper. IMHO $40k is a little high even if it does have a CPO.
Try a search, there were a few posts on pricing in the last few weeks.
40k seems high, even if there were no problems with the paint. Also, if those scratches could have been removed by detailing the caar, I would think the dealership would have done so. I bet they're in there for good unless you repaint the area and I would keep looking. There are a lot of quality used 996s on the market at that price point without such a problem. Good luck!
Oh, Ijust noticed it's a 99...40 is much too high. The CPO is a $1500 add on as far as the dealer's price is concerned, so imagine a non-CPO car (and they really aren't checked out any better, if it's at a dealer it's been checked out) that's a 99 for 38500, no way.
Call Matt Z at Detailing Dynamics
Tell him Eric the Plug Guy sent you. He's the best I've heard in the area, a stand up guy and big part of PCA in that region.
[phone removed]
Mineola, not sure how far from you.
never buy a P car that hasn't been well cared for. If its got sctratches then I would be suspicious about the car. There are lots of subscibers to this forum who clearly love their cars and occasionally let them go to good home. Buy one of those.
Check out the For Sale thread (link below) by Yetis. He is selling a Seal Gray '01 C4 for $40K. He is located in Brooklyn, NY.
https://rennlist.com/forums/996-forum/268237-f-s-2001-996-c4-seal-grey-6-speed.html
To be honest it really isn't for sale at $40k: it's $41.9k! I first spotted it on Autotrader and it was listed for $39.9k. Thought about it for a couple of days and What?!?! It's now $41.9k?? We went to check it out anyway to see if I fit (I'm 6'4") and to see if my wife liked it. That's when I noticed the scratches.
They hadn't washed it yet (we've had a lot of rain recently), so maybe it would look better then, but maybe not. Their ad also said that it was a one owner who just traded up to a 997. CarFax says it's a two-owner.
So all of these anomolies, plus the fact that I really didn't like the interior color, ("beige", but looked more orangish) add up to passing on this one. I checked out '00's on Autotrader and they were around $40k, so maybe this is too high after all.
Thanks for all the help.
tom
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.