fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

996 values back up?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH996 values back up?

Leading reported evidence

Test " takes

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

The term "sniff test" takes on new meaning now when looking at a "too good to be true" P-car.

996 values back up?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Test " takes' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test " takes' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Test " takes

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

The term "sniff test" takes on new meaning now when looking at a "too good to be true" P-car.

996 values back up?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T074343Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I was doing my weekly drive-by of the local dealer and noticed they had several cabs similar to mine (03 about 40K miles, CPO, moderate options) for about $65K marked down to $60-62K. That's more than I paid for mine a year ago and higher than I have seen for a while. Think 996 values are rebounding a little? Incidentally, it has been almost exactly one year of blissful ownership. 14K miles of pure heaven. Not bad considering my commute is only 5 miles each way and I've probably been travelling for at least three of those months. Happy anniversary to me.

POST 2Original post

Maybe so, but there a slew of 1999-2000 996s in the mid-30s in South Florida. Yes, they look to be "rid hard and put up wet" with a bazillion miles on the clock, but they will impact market values down this way. (for those of us looking ot buy a pre-owned P-car, this is Good. For sellers, Not So Good)

POST 3Original post

porschedawg: *Maybe so, but there a slew of 1999-2000 996s in the mid-30s in South Florida.* We spent five nights in Sunny Isles Beach/Aventura and there were darn near as many P-Cars on A1A as there are on the streets of Frankfurt. Then there's the Bentleys, the DB9's...

POST 4Original post

Yes, many P-Cars in South Flordia....... Life is good.

POST 5Original post

Just make sure some of the FL cars haven't be 'soaked'.

POST 6Original post

Sorry, P-car prices are not going up. Your just seeing wishful thinking and pricing by dealers for the Spring and Summer. Dealers will sometimes price their vehicles a little lower during the winter months, especially in nasty weather parts of the country. When the world thaws out, and people start crawling out from under their rocks, the pricing goes up accordingly. Tom L 2002 C2

POST 7Original post

There are four Carreras and about half a dozen Boxsters within two blocks of my house. They make me crazy as the drive by, PSE's singing. My wife is really looking forward to me getting the car so I will stop whining. (Wait til she realizes I need Mods!) "Soaked" P-Cars are a real concern, especially down here, so close to Louisiana. The term "sniff test" takes on new meaning now when looking at a "too good to be true" P-car. Yes, I know a PPI is must. If this forum has taught me nothing else, I know to get a PPI and not to just take the word of a non-Porsche dealer.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.