fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

3.4L better than 3.6L? Oh really?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH3.4L better than 3.6L? Oh really?

Leading reported evidence

Test 0-60 as fast as 4.6

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Not to mention, of course, that the 3.4 cars weigh 100lbs or more less than the 3.6 cars - this is why magazines tested 0-60 as fast as 4.6 for stock cars (with drop clutch starts of course).

3.4L better than 3.6L? Oh really?
Frequently discussed work

Check classifieds

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

PM me for details or check the classifieds.

3.4L better than 3.6L? Oh really?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Test 0-60 as fast as 4.6' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check classifieds' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 17 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 3 other evidence results

Check classifieds

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

PM me for details or check the classifieds.

3.4L better than 3.6L? Oh really?

Run 2 car team in the soon

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I'm going to be running a 2 car team in the soon to be officially announced MX-5 Cup.

3.4L better than 3.6L? Oh really?

Run 3.6 instead of a 3.4

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

In that series you have to add 100 lbs to run a 3.6 instead of a 3.4.

3.4L better than 3.6L? Oh really?
Frequently discussed actions (4)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check classifieds

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

PM me for details or check the classifieds.

3.4L better than 3.6L? Oh really?

Run 2 car team in the soon

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I'm going to be running a 2 car team in the soon to be officially announced MX-5 Cup.

3.4L better than 3.6L? Oh really?

Run 3.6 instead of a 3.4

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

In that series you have to add 100 lbs to run a 3.6 instead of a 3.4.

3.4L better than 3.6L? Oh really?

Test 0-60 as fast as 4.6

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Not to mention, of course, that the 3.4 cars weigh 100lbs or more less than the 3.6 cars - this is why magazines tested 0-60 as fast as 4.6 for stock cars (with drop clutch starts of course).

3.4L better than 3.6L? Oh really?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T013556Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Someone mentioned that an early model 3.4 liter engine can be moded to be stronger/faster/better than a 3.6 liter. Do tell........ (P.S.- I have the 3.4L 1999MY)

POST 2Original post

I might be wrong but I believe what has been said before is that in terms of "chipping" your 996, the 3.4 had more potential for gains than the 3.6 with the chip.

POST 3Original post

All I've seen is the my99 takes better to ECU reflashes than later models years.

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Tell me about "chipping" and ECU flashes..... Who makes, how much $$, how much HP, and how noticeable???

POST 5Original post

I got mine through my local dealership but the company is www.evoms.com . The prices are on their web site.

POST 6Original post

In terms of modding, yes it has been written that the 3.4 has more upside than the 3.6, but let's not kid ourselves, the 3.6 is starting with a 20hp head start. I don't think you'll be catching it soon unless you equal it and then count on the fact that the 3.4s weight less. And of course, my response rests on the 'assumption' that mods add power. I think they do, but I'm not getting into that on yet another thread.

POST 8Original post

3.4 potential is greater than the 3.6? hmmm. Do you mean if one adds, say, 30 hp to either, then the % gain on the 3.4 = 10%; while the gain on a 3.6 =.09375%...is this the potential you're referring to? Or, is it something else...?

POST 9Original post

One advantage of the 3.4 is that it revs faster. Lower recipricating mass equals real gains - in the same way reducing wheel weight does. Not to mention, of course, that the 3.4 cars weigh 100lbs or more less than the 3.6 cars - this is why magazines tested 0-60 as fast as 4.6 for stock cars (with drop clutch starts of course). The only disadvantage the 3.4 has is lower torque than the 3.6, but really it is a great engine. You get 220ftlbs of torque from around 2600rpms, all the way up to 6800 or so, with a peak of 256 around 4500 I think - this is an excellent, flat torque curve. Some say that mods don't add any power, but that is simply ridiculous. Sometimes you may see optimistic claims on certain HP figures, but make no mistake that Porsche engines can benefit from some tweaking. It's funny that many people think that Porsches are perfect and can't be improved upon - yes they are incredible engines, but they haven't squeezed every little bit they can out of them- and they aren't perfect.

POST 10Original post

I think Grand Am Cup can provide some info here. In that series you have to add 100 lbs to run a 3.6 instead of a 3.4. You are allowed to do whatever you want to the ECU, intake before the throttle body and exhaust. Otherwise the engines are stock. Everyone has switched to the 3.6 so it's pretty clear it's the stronger engine. Even with mods and extra weight.

POST 11Original post

how's it going JimB, i was wondering if you could post or PM the details of your x51 3.6 conversion or a point of contact. a guy's (from another board) 3.4L engine needs replacement and he wants to do a 3.6L. it's something i want to do when/if my engine goes too. we both have non-egas early '99's this is a reply from a race shop: "Wiring is completely different type - cannot be rigged & and a complete wiring harness will not mate up with the rest of the car. 3.4L has a 2 solenoid varicam vs any 2000&up has 4 solenoids. Over 3500rpm the car may not run right or at all! Dash pod is different. No easy fix for the e-gas issue, even with programming." this is a reply: The e-gas is a simple issue to resolve, the simplest actually. The wiring on non c4 99 model years is a totally different issue. I would only reccommend it for a track only car. The Variocam wiring is a large part of the problem, as well as some of the security systems in the car. Can it be done, simple answer is yes, but there are issues that make it a more than simple swap. But hey, every job is possible it is just a matter of whether or not it is cost effective." obviously the first race shop is wrong as you have the proof sitting in you engine bay, right? any help would be appreciated.

POST 12Original post

Hey Carlos, I hope all is well. What was that line from Monty Python? Run! Run as fast as you can! I would never suggest converting a non-egas car to a 3.6. With what we spent getting mine to work I would have been way better off buying a donor 2002 and upgrading it. Your mechanic's analysis is pretty good. All the issues can be overcome but you essentially have to build an 02+ car to make it work. Not an inexpensive process. I would buy a used engine for the 99 and trade it in on an 02. You would be money ahead. Have a good day. Jim

POST 13Original post

The conversion is EXPENSIVE. Don't kid yourself. It simply cannot be done correctly on a budget. I don't know the exact amount I spent converting my 2001 3.4L Grand-Am CUP 996 to a 2004 3.6L, but it was upwards of $15,000 (don't remember the actual amount, I really try not to look to hard at invoices as it usually gets depressing, it might have been closer to $20,000 actually). Had I to do it over again, I definitely would not have gone that route. Would have been cheaper to sell it and buy an already built and competitive BMW E46 M3 or the new 2005 Mustang FR500C. Oh well, live and learn. Good news is, the car is now very competitive in the series. Bad news is, I'm racing elsewhere next season and no longer need the car. Gordon Friedman at Autometrics did the swap on my car and did a fantastic job. Yes it was expensive but everything was done right. The car runs great and is much, much stronger than the 3.4L car even with the extra weight the series mandates for the 3.6L cars. On the topic of the 3.4L engine. I had the PMNA ECU reflash for 100 octane fuel (~$1250 or so). Definitely helped though I would say the benefits would be minimal for a street car as most of the gains (SOTP) were in the upper RPM range, not really usable for a street car but great for a racecar. Oh, almost forgot to mention, my 996 is for sale if anyone is interested. PM me for details or check the classifieds.

POST 14Original post

Oh, if your friend needs a 3.4L with PMNA tuned ECU, let me know. My old engine is sitting at Autometrics and I'd LOVE to sell it to someone that could get some use out of it.

POST 16Original post

I'm going to be running a 2 car team in the soon to be officially announced MX-5 Cup. Car's will be totally spec'ed 2006 Mazda MX-5's. Expecting a 40+ car field at the first race in Houston with ALMS and Champ Car. Series will mainly run with the ALMS though I believe we'll have another date with Champcar and a date with Grand-Am (schedule should be out in early January). Jordon Musser and I will be driving the team's two cars. And if anyone is looking for some media exposure, get in touch with me. Our cars are being prepped by the quasi-Mazda Factory team. Jordon is a 5 time National Karting Champion and one of the top upcoming drivers in the U.S. TV package is being put together currently. And you get exposure at ALMS races for a fraction of what sponsorship in that series sells for. Sorry guys, had to throw that plug in there.

POST 17Original post

A few of us looked at the series. It looks like a lot of fun for pretty reasonable money. Good luck and have a great time. Jim

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.