14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHaftermarket warranty for 996
Reported or suspected cause
market
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause · Original poster
The problem is the market for used 996s here in the Salt Lake area is very limited.
Recommend procedure: find it online, have a mechanic
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I thought of that but what's the recommended procedure: Find it online, have a mechanic check it out then fly out to test drive it if it all looks good?
Leading evidence: 'market' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'market' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Recommend procedure: find it online, have a mechanic' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Recommend procedure: find it online, have a mechanic
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I thought of that but what's the recommended procedure: Find it online, have a mechanic check it out then fly out to test drive it if it all looks good?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If you are dead set on a warranty, then you need to consider paying a bit more.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I thought of that but what's the recommended procedure: Find it online, have a mechanic check it out then fly out to test drive it if it all looks good?
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Recommend procedure: find it online, have a mechanic
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I thought of that but what's the recommended procedure: Find it online, have a mechanic check it out then fly out to test drive it if it all looks good?
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I thought of that but what's the recommended procedure: Find it online, have a mechanic check it out then fly out to test drive it if it all looks good?
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T144035Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
First time here. I am considering purchasing a 996 (1999, 46K miles). Here is the car I am considering, any opinions are welcome
http://www.harrisonimports.net/used/...eHistory=true#
I have read about all the engine problems these cars have so I won't buy the car unless I can find a warranty plan that will cover everything, especially an engine replacement. I know most aftermarket warranty companies are just out there to get your money so I am looking for suggestions on companies you've had good experiences with. Thanks!
It is highly unlikely you will find any reputable after market warranty company that will insure a car that old.
In 2009, the cut off for Fidelity was a 2002 and 50,000 miles.
... and yet, on TV a couple weeks ago a company was advertising to cover for older cars and higher mileage than stated above. I cannot vouch for any of them, but they could be out there.
Caveat emptor
to the OP, welcome; What sort of price range are you looking at for a 996 variety? that red 996 is pry worth closer to $15-17K right off the bat.
IMO, that car has seen better days, you're better off going a little newer or at least with a Pcar that has better documentation and care. If you are dead set on a warranty, then you need to consider paying a bit more. Easycare has been mentioned here for aftermarket coverage; won't hurt to make a call.
Thanks for the replies. My budget is quite limited, up to 25K. The problem is the market for used 996s here in the Salt Lake area is very limited. Thanks for the easycare suggestion as well, I will give them a call.
I thought of that but what's the recommended procedure: Find it online, have a mechanic check it out then fly out to test drive it if it all looks good?
Based on your location why not check out Bay Area, CA? There are a few better examples at possible lower cost shipped to you. Actually you can buy and drive home, well not sure with the weather these days
For the money you have to spend you can get a newer car. I would throw this back to ocean. Like Marc said increase your search area. There are cars coming out of the woodwork. Good luck!
The word "hammered" seems more appropriate. How do you get an interior to look that bad with only 46K miles?
Here is the interior of a 53K mile car I just picked up for $24K
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
