12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCan someone tell me what the dealer did for my IMS?
Leading reported evidence
Replace intermediate shaft seal also
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
They probably replaced your intermediate shaft seal also.
Can someone tell me what the dealer did for my IMS?
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Replace intermediate shaft seal also' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check burning smell' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Problem: Check for burning smell after driving vehicle
Can someone tell me what the dealer did for my IMS?
Check fluid leak
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Can someone tell me what the dealer did for my IMS?
Repair bill can be confusing
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The way the Porsche dealers present issues on the repair bill can be confusing.
Can someone tell me what the dealer did for my IMS?
Repair info shown as follows
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Can someone tell me what the dealer did for my IMS?
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T005001Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I was looking back at some prior repair work orders on my 02 C4S that the prior owner had given me. There was some repair info shown as follows:
Problem: Check fluid leak under vehicle
Cause: Leaking rear main seal
1)transmission removed and reinstalled
2)tech measured crankshaft at 9.71, 9.68, 9.69, 9.7
3)sealing ring f cranks. flywheel removed and reinstalled
Assume this was for leaking rear main seal
Problem: Check for burning smell after driving vehicle
Cause: Leaking intermediate shaft seal on engine
1)bearing cover f intermediate shaft removed and reinstalled
2)996-105-024-01 shaft housing
Are these both related to rear main seal or is the second related to the intermediate shaft bearing?
Thanks.
Keith
They probably replaced your intermediate shaft seal also. It's an easy fix when they go in for the RMS work, but in this case it looks like they had to go back in and replace it afterwards...
I they didn't pick up the IMS leak while fixing the RMS, they suck. My bet is the previous owner complained of both a leak and a burning smell when he brought the car in. The way the Porsche dealers present issues on the repair bill can be confusing.
Maybe. Unless dealer can represent the trip in to fix the IMS as a separate issue and get reimbursed for the labor/time to go back in and fix IMS leak.
Remember, as readily as dealers will try to shaft car owners they're not above shafting Porsche if they think they can.
I suspect Porsche recognizes this and as long as it is no too bad even turns a blind eye to it as a semi-official way of helping out dealers that aren't selling as many cars and servicing as many cars. Trouble is it sets a bad precedent that I'm sure dealers will seek to exploit in ever more creative ways.
Sincerely,
Macster
Thanks for the comments. Sorry both of the problems,issues were on same repair order and were taken care of on same service visit. I assume that the IMS seal has nothing to do with the infamous IMS failure.
Thanks.
Keep all your records , especially the RMS, IMS related ones.
On my third RMS/IMS seal replacement for my 03 C4S and related upgraded related bolt replacement, I was OUT of warranty coverage and communicated with Porsche NA by sending them all my related records and they covered the cost of the evaluation, i.e. tear-down to find out if RMS or IMS, which dealer wanted me to pay up front as warranty was out, and replacing both seals.
Porsche would not cover the bearing replacement on the IMS, despite history of torn seals. The good probablility of bearing failure seems to be the ticking "time bomb" people have referrred to on this site and dealer advised me on.
The dealer recommended that I go to an upgraded part from LF Engineering.
$ 1,200 worth of work which I chose not to do....I sealed it up and sold the car with seals fixed on a trade-in.
If the car continues to give you IMS/RMS issues, you may come to that crossroad......I hope yours is fixed for good, if that is possible.
Abiazis, you have described my situation exactly. I am on leak #3 and now out of warranty. Dealer wants me to bring in car have them open it up and THEN see if Porsche will pay for the fix. I want to know before I take it in if Porsche will pony up to do the right thing.
Almost 47K, the last leak was just 5K miles ago just before CPO warranty expired. Regular driving (a lot of between 3500-4500 rpm), mixed in with occasional fun runs that involve higher rpm's.
With that level of low miles, I would go for new engine with Porsche NA since they have done it previously with others in similar situation and then sell the car........ since the engine may have the possibility of the same issues......
47K is too low assuming the maintenance was followed, etc...which I am sure it was...
Mine happened at roughly 60, 68 and 78......I followed maintenance to the T and did not abuse car.....
Heck, I can run the pee out of a, i.e. Corolla or even any comparable American car for 47K, for that matter 100K, and not have these issues, as I had with the P-Car due to a poor engineering design with M96 engine......
I also had to replace, under CPO warranty - all ignition coils, waterpump, oil filler tube, 2 horns, 2 catalytic converters, 3 O2 sensors, and a clutch throwout bearing........the brakes lasted 80 K plus though, which was great!!
C4S was a blast to drive, but going to shop 6 times a year for 6 years was not convenient....but I got to know all the techs at the dealer.............
It is kind of ridiculous when having 80K miles on a Porsche is considered high mileage in these days of synthetic oils and improved reliability of cars in general.....Porsche blew it with the 996 and early 997.1 version....IMHO....
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.