48 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHi found this funny
Reported or suspected cause
fastest car i ever owned)
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
(I had a full Dinan prepped M5 that was probably the fastest car I ever owned).
Leading evidence: 'fastest car i ever owned)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'fastest car i ever owned)' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace rennlist screen name' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
though i still wouldn't mind one to drive around every once in a while, knowing full well that i have a 944 that will run perfectly fine when the 308 drops a clutch.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
though i still wouldn't mind one to drive around every once in a while, knowing full well that i have a 944 that will run perfectly fine when the 308 drops a clutch.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
48 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T183130Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Reminds me of that song:
"One of these things is not like the other. One of these things does not belong......."
Sesame Street (for those of you who remember)
" The italian Carabinieri needed its ultra elite secret force in order to apprehend an american tourist after delivery of his new (to him) german supercar. He made it to the border and no charges were made."
Please tell me you are kidding.
Really...because I can't tell.
Tim's Honda would probably school those 308s and maybe even the 328s pictured in the photo.
And yes, I am totally serious.
"ooohhh....so, there's a "Porsche" club? I'm a little embarrassed."
or
"John was separated from the herd as a baby, but was adopted by Ferraris. He always felt different...but, could never understand why."
Bob
don't have to look em up: 200hp, with GTS
i
producing 240hp. don't know the torque numbers, but i'd venture a guess of 180-190 at best. though i still wouldn't mind one to drive around every once in a while, knowing full well that i have a 944 that will run perfectly fine when the 308 drops a clutch. 25g for it, i'd take it.
only the 288gt(a 308 with a 2.8l) would have had an output near 400hp. of course some modifications to the motor, twin turbo's, it's mounting position, and suspension, among most everything else.
Do you know anything about Fcars? Seriously. How about giving more than a three or four word answer so there cannot be anything lost in translation over the internet.
I have driven a good friends '91 TR extensively and believe me, my bone stock 2000 911 Carrera would destroy it on a track. In turn, the TR would easily beat the 308 or 328 in a race.
Once again, I stand by my claim that Tim's Accord would beat at least the 308 on a track given equal drivers.
yea i know. didn't wanna look up those numbers though, hp comes from my head from stats i've read over the years. truthfully i've looked at 308's, but though better of it. now with some upgrades for the suspension it'd probably be a decent car, most are nearly 30yrs old...
My caption for this pic:
Wife says to husband "Honey, I think we should pass on today's fun drive. I don't think your
F*ck Ferrari
bumper sticker is going to play well with this group!"
Stopping to take a quick pee on the Autostrade turned into quite an adventure for Walter. He was shocked to find dozens of Tifosi crowding the adjacent urinals to see if the rumors about Porsche drivers were true.
I have owned both 308 and 328. A well tuned 911 is certainly a faster, quicker car, for sure. The 308 is an absolute DOG. The 328 is a much better car, but not what I would call a "fast" car. (I had a full Dinan prepped M5 that was probably the fastest car I ever owned). I never could get used to the clunky steering and shifter gate either. My experience is you have to go for the big buck cars to really get a good F car. For me, the F car's best attribute was the engine/exhaust sound. Negatives, if you think every redneck in a mustang or honda wants to race your P car, try driving a F car around. Also, F car people are not the same as P car people. P car folks tend mostly to be drivers and sportsmen with some posers sprinkled in. If you have owned one, you know what I am talking about. F car is just the opposite. I sold both and went P and never looked back. On my 3rd P now.
