20 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAre these side skirts so horribly wrong?
Leading reported evidence
Use mk i in 2002
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I think Porsche last used the MK I in 2002 and changed it to MK II in late 2002 or early 2003.
Leading evidence: 'Use mk i in 2002' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use mk i in 2002' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
20 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T171335Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I just got this car and I like the nose and the side skirts, but a few of you mentioned that they are MKI and I should have MKII.
Are these horribly wrong?
I want to get a rear wing and better wheels, but will the MKII side skirts make that much of a difference?
Need opinions.
Thanks
Since the nose is not period-correct, I wouldn't worry about the side skirts. They look perfectly fine. And the ONLY folks who will know the difference or care enough to mention it are the folks on this forum or at a PCA Parade-level concours judging. Get whatever spoiler pleases YOU. These cars are NOT yet in the window for total period/date correct parts requirements. That is the coolest thing about 996's. THESE are the ones you can modify and customize to your hearts content without castigation.
In my own personal opinion, your car would be an excellent candidate for the sugar scoop rear spoiler that looks like the '73-'74 RS. The color is just right to pull that off nicely. Since the front nose is styled from a 997 GT3RS, the whole thing would actually come together well, I think.
I like it and the price sounds great. Just get a PPI (pre-purchase inspection) to see that the car was not abused or had any body damage that was repaired. I would also consider getting a nice tail to balance the looks of the aggressive front-end style.
When I bought my 2003, I ordered the side skirts and it was supposed to be the MK I syle. I think Porsche last used the MK I in 2002 and changed it to MK II in late 2002 or early 2003. I actually like the MK I GT3 kit.
Yeah, make it a +1 for me, as well, I think the car's front end and skirts look great... And another +1 for putting a good tail on there... I think it'd look bad@ss with a GT2 tail...
Obviously, you were attracted to your Porsche 911 when you bought it. Based on that, I would think you are fine in keeping that look and perhaps adding a rear wing if that's in the cards to complete the loo your after. I also think your Porsche looks fine as is.
I was the guy (or at least one of them) that pointed out the MK I skirts on the MK II car. I did that prior to you purchasing the car, only because I wanted you to know that the version of the skirts did not match the version of the car.
I actually like the MK I skirts better than the MK II skirts and I think they look good on your car. If you like them don't worry about what anyone else thinks, including me!
Hell, what do I know? I don't even own a Porsche anymore! I drive a f*cking POS Honda!
Thanks for saying that Tim, you were one of the guys who pointed out that the skirts were the wrong ones.
I like the GT2 rear wings, they would look great on my car as would the Techart 19" Formula wheels, thank for the opinions guys!
This is my GT2 style wing which was recently installed. It would match well with your GT2 style front bumper and those side skirts. If you are looking into this type of wing, check to see if the wing blade is adjustable which would provide for adding or reducing downforce (and add to the cool factor
).
I actually bought those factory wheels when I track tires on my turbo twists. They are not unique but when I could have anything I chose those because I think nothing looks better. My Opinion. Like 996 Pilot above, there will be no shortage of guys who will take them off your hands.
secretly we snicker, but say they look fine
look, if you are worried about your side skirts that means you are NOT laying awake in bed all night worrying about the traditional 996 things... that's a good thing, keep em' and know some will not like em, some will, and worrying about them = as productive as the traditional worry areas...
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
