Rennlist

Question about agency power rear adjustable control arms

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

1 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHQuestion about agency power rear adjustable control arms

Leading reported evidence

Use adjustable rear control arms

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
So, I was thinking about using the adjustable rear control arms but am concerned that the ball socket ends would transmit too much road noise into the chassis.
Original post Read captured discussion
Question about agency power rear adjustable control arms

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use adjustable rear control arms' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use adjustable rear control arms' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 1 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use adjustable rear control arms

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
So, I was thinking about using the adjustable rear control arms but am concerned that the ball socket ends would transmit too much road noise into the chassis.
Original post Read captured discussion
Question about agency power rear adjustable control arms

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

1 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T060112Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I am trying to get my car aligned ( 2000 C2 coupe with H&R springs) and the shop is having a hard time getting close to factory rear camber specs. The closest they can come is about 2 degrees 30 in the rear. If I drove mostly on the track that would be great but I rarely put the car on the track (that's what my 928 is for). So, I was thinking about using the adjustable rear control arms but am concerned that the ball socket ends would transmit too much road noise into the chassis. If any of you have done this could you please explain if this is a problem or not. I would really like to get the rear camber back to a factory setting so I am not eating up tires every 6 months or so. Thanks JIM

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.