17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHOT: Traffic lawyer in White Plains, NY
Leading reported evidence
Use google if you want)
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
No specific recommendations but what I do is search (use google if you want) for an attorney/law office that specializes in traffic citations very near (as close as possible) to the courthouse where the citation will be dealt with.
Leading evidence: 'Use google if you want)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use google if you want)' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Use google if you want)
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
No specific recommendations but what I do is search (use google if you want) for an attorney/law office that specializes in traffic citations very near (as close as possible) to the courthouse where the citation will be dealt with.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
It worked for me in 2005 and I got the ticket dismissed without ever appearing in court.
No specific recommendations but what I do is search (use google if you want) for an attorney/law office that specializes in traffic citations very near (as close as possible) to the courthouse where the citation will be dealt with. These attorneys and their staff handle a lot of tickets per year and have a good system, cost effective and with a high success rate of getting the ticket dealt with.
Call a couple of phone numbers until you find one that will handle your wife's citation.
If she was really doing 80, she got caught. Do traffic school or pay the piper. I can't say I would invest in trying to get off of that one, unless there was something unscrupulous about the stop. Sometimes it's just taking responsibility which isn't always fun, but sometimes the best option.
I might be missing something else in regards to the severity, but that is my initial reaction FWIW.
I live in the Metro NY area as well and I can tell you that if you drive slower than 80 on the parkways, people want to push you out of the way, even in the middle lane. So basically it comes down to selective prosecution. It's like holding penalties in football, they could be called on every play, but they pick and choose when to throw the flag.
Hi Steve
Wife told me that my son was hungry and fussy so she wanted to get home quick to feed him. This is going to be an expensive meal..
Miss our old group in the 996 forum. Glad to see some of us holding up the fort still.
There's a technicality that has a high likelihood of working in NYS, but you have to act fast. Any NYS traffic lawyer will know about this. It worked for me in 2005 and I got the ticket dismissed without ever appearing in court. Well worth the attorney's fee I paid.
I have seen George Nader get a speeding ticket (105 in a 40!!!!) reduced to a "disobeying traffic device" ticket, only two points... = no nasty insurance problems, call him!
This is why our judicial system is so screwed up. Because the people that "do" and by "do" I mean proven, actually commit the offense are allowed to blame that on someone else and get off. Not throwing any stones at the OP's wife here just playing devils advocate. Just because everyone else is doing it doesn't mean it isn't breaking the law.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
