20 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHcamber plates : oem or aftermarket?
Reported or suspected cause
durable
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
I also like that fact that the OEM units have proven to be durable.
Leading evidence: 'durable' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'durable' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Set front or rear' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Are you looking for that setting for the front or rear?
Use lca's and shims installed in the standard configuration
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You can get plenty of camber using the LCA's and shims installed in the standard configuration.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
20 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T000231Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
With the porsche gt3 camber plate (aka monoball) priced the same as the tarett or rennline camber plates, what is the better hardware
?
I am installing my pss9 soon and I think I'll buy a set to get the extra 1degree of camber in the front., they are still cheaper ($500) than the lower control arms ($1000) and will be easier to install as well.
any experience on this ?
I just went with the GT3 monoballs knowing that my car will mainly be a street car first and foremost and the fact that I don't need crazy camber most of the time. If you drill out the alternate set of holes, you can further increase camber. I also like that fact that the OEM units have proven to be durable. Can't say that for some aftermarket ones I've read about in the past. But for someone doing a good amount of DE and track days, I would probably get the adjustable ones.
If you get OEM mounts can't you rotate them to give you more camber to start?
Lower control arms give you a wider track, so that may be beneficial. Not to mention adjustability with shims. Tarett sells LCAs for ~$700.
If it was me, I'd go with the LCA first, and upper mounts second.
-td
I am afraid the LCA would be more of a pain to install than the upper mount. but you are right, they are very close in price, the oem are $799 at
suncoast
..
tough choice, I am waiting for feedback before pressing the trigger on any of them.
Definitely Tarret Engineering is the way to go. I've been going back and forth with Ira and he's great. The hardware is completely up to snuff.
Get the LCAs and don't look back.
good thinking... I forgot about the ride height thing.
I think I will go ahead and install the LCA in the front, that will give me more control if I need more camber in the future I think.
Also that way I don't have to go with monoballs, as it seems for monoball, your suspension is only as good as your weakest link. So it makes better sense to go monoball all the way (a bunch of other control arms and toe links) at once to really see the value added.
I read in the forum that I need to mount the LCA 'rs style' (left arm on the right side and right arm on the left side) if I want to obtain camber in the -2.5
can anyone confirm this point ? I mean why simply not adding shims ? I think there is a caster problem with too many shims or something.
I will certainly do the mod next week so I wanted to clear this point as I only saw this discussed on 2 threads.
No need to do that. You can get plenty of camber using the LCA's and shims installed in the standard configuration.
If you change your mind and go with camber plates too, go with Tarrett. They are well constructed, and Ira is great to do business with. Also, they are part of the Spec996 rules, so when you rip out the interior, cage up, and go racing, it will be one less thing you will have to change. You KNOW you're going to eventually!
