14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMaryland and my Valentine One
Leading reported evidence
Run without a front plate
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
if you can run without a front plate, that should help your chances a bit.
Leading evidence: 'Run without a front plate' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run without a front plate' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Anyone from Maryland know if the troopers there are all exclusively using laser and/or 'instant on' radar?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
then again - if they're pacing by using other vehicles on the ground...thats a different story.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
i find it more useful to be alert and vigilant than to use a radar detector.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Depending on where you saw the troopers on 95, they maybe using vascar (timer system).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T053112Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Just drove through Maryland yesterday on I-95 and noticed a large number of troopers, some in unmarked Mustangs and Camaros. However, my Valentine One did not go off at all. Anyone from Maryland know if the troopers there are all exclusively using laser and/or 'instant on' radar?
I'm not sure about Maryland but mine never goes off in N.Y. either.
I even got a ticket over the summer and my detector never went off. I'm beginning to think my unit is broken.
Depending on where you saw the troopers on 95, they maybe using vascar (timer system). There's a couple area's heading north of the beltway where the road has cross lines across the lanes, these are the timing marks.
Ideal roads for lettting it out: divided highways where the opposite side is not close and the road is elevated enough so that guard rails are on both sides; no overpasses, or bridges, and no airplanes aloft!
.. Oh, and no traffic either.
i'm in on the M5 group buy for the new (not even out yet) lidatek le-30 laser jammer. i believe it is still open - go to the site, register and get in on it.
http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/sho...0&page=3&pp=35
Even with LASER your unit should go off if it's pointed at you. You may not have any time to react but it should sound off- mine definitely has! Only problem with LASER is it's band is so narrow it's you he's pointed at (little scatter) and you'd better have incredible reflexes!! And yes, VASCAR is simply a stopwatch and known distance markers- nothing is emitted to intercept unfortunately.
ski is right - the laser beam is so tight that there is very little 'scatter' for the V1 to pick up unless you're lucky enough for the laser beam to drift a bit and score a direct hit on the V1.
laser is aimed at points that will reflect the most - license plate and headlights. if you can run without a front plate, that should help your chances a bit. i'm double-lucky in my 951 as no headlights during the day! with no front plate, i'm a relatively stealthy target.
one thing that may help you if you really want to make it a game - get a portable scanner, do a little digging on the internet and find the air/ground frequencies that the state police use up there. if they have an aircraft up you'll be notified.
when i worked in local news, i was in a vehicle that had a couple of scanners. the air/ground freq is low-power enough that - when active - you only hear it when you're getting right in the area where they are working. in other words - if you hear something on the air/ground freq, slow down and look in the sky. this tactic saved me many times when my V1 (or any detector) was useless due to the fact that there was nothing to detect!!
its extreme, i realize, but something to consider. then again - if they're pacing by using other vehicles on the ground...thats a different story.
oh - they can also laser you from behind - say, an on-ramp. not as common, but since you have to be stationary to operate the laser, its becoming more of an option for johnny law.
Washington, you are so right. I noticed a few unmarked cars on the right side of the road, parked on the side of an onramp. Although not as traditional, it is now being done more often. However, if you are paying attention (as I was) you can spot him, slow down and move over before he can hit you. One trouper even gave me a really nasty look as I went by because he knew I slowed down and could see the cord from my V-1 hanging down from the rearview mirror. He didn't bother to clock me though.
ha! love it. i really look at this as a little game between me and the police. if/when i do get pulled over for speeding, i'm respectful and helpful as i figure i've won a LOT of these confrontations and he just won ONE.
anyway - side note: i got a 3.5 MILE advance warning on a Ka Band constant-on radar two nights ago on alligator alley with my V1. not surprising given how flat and straight that area is, but pretty amazing...
Yes a scanner is very helpful. Back in the 55 days I used one a lot but it got to be a pain carrying so much stuff in the car! At least in Iowa you'd never notice the plane without actually knowing it's there- they are pretty high! There are lists around, probably from the same people you get the scanner from. The newer portable scanners at least are smaller and can be used at races to listen to the chatter from the pits to the cars- great fun! You can catch Paul Tracy unfiltered- and that's an education!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
