10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHFairly new member..paying one soon
Leading reported evidence
Fill " light also should come
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Fill " light also should come' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Fill " light also should come' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Low beam Litronics should be obvious, it the high beams that are miss leading because there is also a halogen fill lamp that comes on.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T174436Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Just bought from second owner, a 2002 C2 coupe, 6 spd, seal gray/black, supple, heated with lumbar, technic, 18" 5 spokes, PSM, rear wiper, new tires, new brakes, 37.5 k miles for $32k. Had the 30k service done. Good service paper trail. Been doing my homework the last few months and this seemed like a good deal.
Am I correct in assuming that Technic always comes with Litronic? The lower bulb is clearly a halogen, so I was surprised when I read the order sheet. Have to do more searching. Overall, mostly excellent, has some wheel rash on all 4, only really bad on one, radio is dead, one segment on the led CC is out. Need to do a real thorough detail with the PCRO buffer on it, and Langka some terrible touch up blobs. 2nd owner paid $49.5k for it 8/06. Needed to sell for house. Right place right time, Drove it, paid for and got the title/temp tags today. Get the car tomorrow AM. Will post pics (tho, since it is stock, it's not like everyone here doesn't already know exactly what it looks like. Got to look into the short shift kits
That sucks, you just basically described my car and I though it was worth more than $32K...
Nice car though, enjoy.
Low beam Litronics should be obvious, it the high beams that are miss leading because there is also a halogen fill lamp that comes on. With the Bi-xenon the same lens does low and high, there is just a shutter that opens up the beam higher when in high mode. A halogen "fill" light also should come on.
Andy
Great buy, all others like it would cost way more and nobody can tell me different.
In case you have not heard it enough...pics? Just because it is stock, does not mean I have grown tired of looking at it/them. Always appreciate..
Nice Grab!!! Yes...technic package should include bi-xenons. WELCOME ABOARD! Sounds like you got it for way below market, but desperate fast sells usually result in that.
J
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
