fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

"Chipping" the 996, article in Excellence Mag.

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
43 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH"Chipping" the 996, article in Excellence Mag.

Leading reported evidence

Run straight pipes right out of the headers

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Granted my car is light at 2910 lbs and I'm running straight pipes right out of the headers but the X51 is a very strong package.

"Chipping" the 996, article in Excellence Mag.
Frequently discussed work

Replace 2 of the cams (at least

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I believe the 3.4 "Power Kit" or whatever it's called only changes 2 of the cams (at least from looking at RoW PET).

"Chipping" the 996, article in Excellence Mag.
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run straight pipes right out of the headers' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace 2 of the cams (at least' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 43 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 3 other evidence results

Replace 2 of the cams (at least

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I believe the 3.4 "Power Kit" or whatever it's called only changes 2 of the cams (at least from looking at RoW PET).

"Chipping" the 996, article in Excellence Mag.

Replace intake and exhaust cams (4)

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

According to my service manuals the X51 changes both intake and exhaust cams (4).

"Chipping" the 996, article in Excellence Mag.

Run motronic 5.2 vs motronic 7.x

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

for the 99 cars (they run motronic 5.2 vs Motronic 7.x for MY 2000-2001) it takes about 300 km for it to learn...

"Chipping" the 996, article in Excellence Mag.
Frequently discussed actions (4)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace 2 of the cams (at least

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I believe the 3.4 "Power Kit" or whatever it's called only changes 2 of the cams (at least from looking at RoW PET).

"Chipping" the 996, article in Excellence Mag.

Replace intake and exhaust cams (4)

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

According to my service manuals the X51 changes both intake and exhaust cams (4).

"Chipping" the 996, article in Excellence Mag.

Run motronic 5.2 vs motronic 7.x

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

for the 99 cars (they run motronic 5.2 vs Motronic 7.x for MY 2000-2001) it takes about 300 km for it to learn...

"Chipping" the 996, article in Excellence Mag.

Run straight pipes right out of the headers

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Granted my car is light at 2910 lbs and I'm running straight pipes right out of the headers but the X51 is a very strong package.

"Chipping" the 996, article in Excellence Mag.
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

43 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T061840Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

On page 36 of the November issue in the Tech Notes section is a small article that claims that the GIAC Flash performs better in the 3.4 than in the 3.6's with most power gains in the 4k-6500 range. 12hp-15hp is gained in the 3.4's. The 3.6's have a better engine software mapping so the 3.6's struggled to gain 6-8hp from the GIAC Flash. The article claims that it's not worth getting the GIAC on a 3.6. They also mention that the Evo Intake/Flash combo doesn't quite make the 15-18hp gains from "his" experience.. "His" is Steve Weiner at Rennsport Systems in Oregon.

POST 2Original post

I read that as well. Sounds promising for those of us in the 99-01 996. But......he is stating roughly 12hp (realistic) and better throttle response when you have done the GIAC flash and the airbox from Evo. Not sure about the costs, but I would imagine you would be in the $1500-2K range for those 2 mods? Is that worth it?

POST 3Original post

Dell - On the other hand, a 12 hp gain for (let's use your higher number) $2,000 versus a 26 hp gain at a cost of $16,900 if you order the X51 package on a new 997. GIAC @ $166 per "pony" versus X51 @ $650 per "pony." Of course, X51 gets you a few other goodies, including PSE. GIAC is not a bad cost per "pony" but then everything is always relative, isn't it?

POST 4Original post

The chip is around $1,100 and the evo v-flo is around $550, so you're right in the ballpark Dell ( no pun intended). Steve used to post here. He's a good guy and very knowledgeable. I'm not sure if he's around anymore.

POST 5Original post

I did those mods in my Z years ago and never really felt the difference, except in my wallet. 12 hp in a 3200 lb car. I don't know? Just my opinion.

POST 6Original post

Tim, you math is correct but your logic is way off The X51 gets you a better engine that can withstand the stresses of the increased HP. If you read the GIAC website carefully they state that this flash canl put undue stress on your car that can lead to premature failure. I would rather pay for the X51. But all things considered I am VERY happy with my 300hp 996 and have a blast on the track and street. If you have 300 and want 12 you will want 25 when you have 325 and on and on and on. WHERE DOES THE INSANITY END!!!!!!

POST 7Original post

Get a turbo...the GIAC flash will get you 70-80 hp.

POST 9Original post

But.....you do have to do a full exhaust system upgrade as well. from the GIAC website: GIAC performance software for the 2001- Current 996� Twin Turbo smoothly delivers a 65-75 hp and 75-85 ft-lbs gain. For optimum power gains the software must be coupled with a complete exhaust upgrade. All Factory exhausts exhausts are too restrictive for GIAC K24 programming.

POST 10Original post

I have the GIAC flash on my 99 c2 and what a difference it made... for the 99 cars (they run motronic 5.2 vs Motronic 7.x for MY 2000-2001) it takes about 300 km for it to learn... but boy does it learn good ... by the 800 km mark the car was pulling really strong above 4000 rpm and the "lethargy" of the 3.4 motor at 3000 rpm was gone... I also have a PSE and K&N.... some observations.... I was racing my friend in his 997 (NON-s).. he even had lightweight rims (champion RG5) and we raced all afternoon... strait line... highway... low-speed to high speed... all in-gear acceleration... no stoplight racing.... he couldn't get by me all day long... at the end he came up to me and said he was VERY impressed with my mods and that my 996 was the first one he couldn't get by.... (his 997 had over 20,000 miles on it so I think it was broken in quite well) I think the Motronic 5.2 and GIAC flash are a great combo that extract more HP than the 2000 and 2001 MY cars (because of motronic 5.2 that is...) I think it's money well spent... and if I were near portland oregon... I'd let Steve do me an X51 European spec style... he really knows his stuff and he's very straitforward and honest. -Peter

POST 12Original post

let me clear things up... it's the european power kit for the 99 cars.... it was never officially released as "x51" but it's very similar and generates lots of hp. I'm in contact with somebody who has dyno numbers for it and will share my findings... -Peter

POST 13Original post

I want to learn more. any specifics on differences and the output etc.?

POST 14Original post

Sean, let me get some more info and I'll send you a PM.

POST 15Original post

Not only is the X-51 a much better package, you also don't void the warrantee which may not matter if you are off anyway but think about it. If Porsche could have reliably attained 10 HP with just a program, it would be there already. So unless you are willing to accept the possbility of expensive failures, the "chip" is not for you.

POST 16Original post

yup X51 is factory stuff... can't go wrong with that

POST 18Original post

True, but Porsche has emissions and varing fuel grades to contend with.

POST 19Original post

Thank you. As if 10hp is so unreasonable if it's tuned for 91 octane.

POST 20Original post

Anybody know what the Porsche part number is for the Euro Power Kit? Can Sunset get the kit?

POST 21 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Yeah, that was funny... Upon reviewing the dyno graph for the 2000 996 on the Evoms web site the Flash and Intake seem to average 12hp and 14tq . The 20hp+ plus doesn't occur until 6.5k-7.2k rpms. 2000 Cab 996 graph http://www.evoms.com/porsche%20ec%20art%20test.htm The 3.6 graph lines are pretty tight together. http://www.evoms.com/porsche%20ec%20art%20test.htm

POST 22Original post

If you're talking about the 3.4 X51 upgrade, that's cams, heads, intake , pistons, oiling kit and 3rd radiator. Let me know if you find a good source for it.

POST 23Original post

It's interesting the cost of flashing various cars. I am not up for $1100/12 hp in my 996, but I Superchipped my Excursion diesel for massive gains at $299. Big burnouts, much more towing power. Ub

POST 24Original post

Its not about the HP it's about the extra torque you get from 3500 rpm and beyond; that's what you feel... .. it's not gonna slam you back in your seat but you *will* notice a difference.

POST 25Original post

Hiya Rob: Oh yes, I'm still here,...... (and I do have a new X-51 engine kit for the 3.4's on the shelf)

POST 26Original post

We've obviously done a looooooot of Flashing The 3.4Ls do have more headroom and produce more power (in terms of the gains) then the 3.6L but so far everyone that's done it has been very happy. The tip in, throttle response and even gas mileage is improved

POST 27 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

It's both in my opinion, the TQ to get me off the line faster and the HP at HWY speeds. Both helped me fend off a flawless looking, lightly modded, candy red Supra TT last night.

POST 29Original post

For what it's worth, I'm a big fan of the X51 kit. Mine is on a 3.6L but I assume the impact on a 3.4 is similar. With it my 996 was a couple of car lengths faster than a real euro 993 RSCS on the staight at Road America. My car runs dead even on the straight with a GT3 MKIIs. Granted my car is light at 2910 lbs and I'm running straight pipes right out of the headers but the X51 is a very strong package. Jim

POST 30Original post

What does something like the x51 package for the 3.4L run? What about time for install (labor)?

POST 31Original post

That X51 kit is the way to go if you can get the parts.

POST 32Original post

I believe the parts alone are close to $7K. Figure another grand for the install. At this point it may make more sense to just go with a supercharger....

POST 33Original post

I think $1k for install is pretty optimistic. That's only about 10 hrs. It's a big job. Remember, new heads, cams, intake, oiling kit, etc.

POST 34Original post

Good point. Probably more, which would really make me want to opt for a supercharger.....

POST 35Original post

Anyone know what's involved in installing cams? Is this a drop the motor thing or not? I've heard it must be done carefully to make sure things are not screwed up and you slam the valves into the pistons. I keep thinking about Scrhick which has a few cam sets. The cams are really supposed to wake up these motors--or so I keep hearing. The X51 kit I think is only intake or exhaust cams (can't remember which). Somewhere I have a post to the Schrick catalog. They also have a solid lifter version with more lift as well. .

POST 36Original post

Solid lifter cams require periodic adjustment though which costs bucks. I had to do this on my m5 every 15k @ 1k+ and that was relatively easy because it was right there whereas the P car you would have to drop the motor I would assume

POST 37Original post

After just checking my factory pricing, the X-51 Power Kit runs around $ 9K; as of 9/30/05. Its a substantial engine modification suite consisting of: 1) New pistons 2) Head assemblies 3) Cams (4) 4) Valves (all) & valve springs 5) Intake manifold 6) Exhaust manifolds 7) Oil pump 8) All hardware & gaskets Porsche's HP rating is IMHO, very conservative. Its a substantial increase in torque & HP. The big plus is that its all factory stuff and will not impact long-term durability/longevity. One cannot say the same for a forced induction kit.

POST 38 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

"The" Steve Weiner, from the article???..... Can you expound on the GIAC and Intake article?

POST 39Original post

Steve, Is that for the 3.6 or 3.4? I believe the 3.4 "Power Kit" or whatever it's called only changes 2 of the cams (at least from looking at RoW PET). There may be other differences. Thanks for the continued good info!

POST 40Original post

wonder what the WHP is after upgrading with the powerkit.... do you think it is close to 300 WHP?

POST 41Original post

Yessir, thats me,... May kindly suggest that you call me? I'd be pleased to help. That will make it easier to handle any Q & A about this subject.

POST 42Original post

The one I have is for the 3.4,. but they do make one for the drive-by-wire 3.6's.

POST 43Original post

According to my service manuals the X51 changes both intake and exhaust cams (4).

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.