30 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 A/C removal
Leading reported evidence
Use season)
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Myself I really need to consider shocks & springs other then OEM (which I have used all season)...
Leading evidence: 'Use season)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'little' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace much based' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I used these as they came with the used Motons when I bought them some years ago.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
Brad Roberts gave me the spring rates , probably a little to much roll but not severe.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Like the Motons I rearely change much based on the feedback I give my set up guy
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
As much as would like to save the money the guy's running H improved have them and will get to keep them either way so I am hopping they do not make the rule change, need a couple more seconds to catch the Pete's.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
As much as would like to save the money the guy's running H improved have them and will get to keep them either way so I am hopping they do not make the rule change, need a couple more seconds to catch the Pete's.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
As much as would like to save the money the guy's running H improved have them and will get to keep them either way so I am hopping they do not make the rule change, need a couple more seconds to catch the Pete's.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
30 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T053112Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
It's in PET for ROW ac delete cars, pretty sure it is 996 102 151 65 - if you use a smaller crank pulley/underdrive, you must go a little shorter still.
For the safety and the environment concerns.
Remember to have the AC system freon evacuated/discharged properly for recycling.
Also remember that you can now also remove condensors, lines, evaporator, expansion valve, drier, etc etc. if you really want to get lower weight.
If the rules go towards the complete interior removal... ITS all gone! otherwise all carpet and headliner... trunk is already looking bare (last night).
During the clash the car showed it is in needed of a diet near 300 lbs, just to make the minimum with 1/8 tank of gas.
Well now the big question. How much weight came off in the AC delete ? Car needs the to loose but 150 over the winter but I really like the AC on grid.
Dave, not really sure yet... Maybe Alex or someone lese whom have already pulled it out has an actual wieght savings.
Myself I really need to consider shocks & springs other then OEM (which I have used all season)... still waiting to see about the new rules on remote res...
Don't you have the Moton's w/ remotes in your car? Thought I saw them at the Clash... If so, what spring rates are you using?
Chris
No remotes I have PS10's @ 850 650 . I am considering the Moton's and also waiting on the rules. As much as would like to save the money the guy's running H improved have them and will get to keep them either way so I am hopping they do not make the rule change, need a couple more seconds to catch the Pete's.
Do you find the PS10's not getting the car pushed down? Myself I find the X74 kit works... but still allows to much body roll. I was thinking to go with 850 f/r... (that is what Alex is running & it works nice for his car..) Do the 650's keep the rear planted or is it a trade off for wet traction?
We need more seat time to catch Pete...
How was the track Thursday? I hear the weather was WET! Pete joined us Saturday on Lightning. I ended up cutting a tire in T3... testing Hoosiers finally... Can keep running the MPSC's if I want to run with you...
No doubt on the Hoosiers, and stickers if you want the front half of the grid. Brad Roberts gave me the spring rates , probably a little to much roll but not severe. I am not the best at set up, as long as nothing important falls off I tend to just drive it.
Thursday got to drive the AM and was back in my office for the afternoon and back at the track friday it is nice to have a track an hour from home.
The hard part is figuring out what works with your driving style, aero setup and tire combination. The
X74 OEM worked great with the MPSC's... but is NOT working with the Hoosiers... The higher grip now gives me tons of body roll... Front is WAY TO SOFT! I really thought your car worked well at the clash...
Friday/Saturday was fun... I hear you on the close to home track... WGI is only 1.5 hrs from my place... We spend lots of time there.. Last week was our 1st trip to NJMP...loved it!
I just happened to see your question. Yes we removed everything including the front radiators etc. There is on tube somewhere in the engine compartment that cannot be removed without removing the engine, so that is still in there.
What are you up to? Lightening up for 2011? At Summit Point I was called into the scales and my weight was 3089 (3060 being the min) Hey check out
www.rennpoints.com
Congrats on 1st place! You are the MAN!
I am looking at taking the car on a diet for 2011 (as well as me!) and making it a Full race car. Rolled the fenders over the weekend (as I cut a brand new Hoosier at NJMP Saturday on the D-side front fender), putting a Rear wing & front splitter on as well as Moton's... Are you really happy with the 850's all around?
Also, after running last Monday/Tuesday at WGI with Hoosiers (added more neg camber front) I was 2.5 sec faster then my MSPSC's... So, you were right.
The 850 front and rear are fine for me. I used these as they came with the used Motons when I bought them some years ago. I hear some who say stiffer might be better but I just try to learn what I drive. Like the Motons I rearely change much based on the feedback I give my set up guy
I find myself doing the same... Just learn to make the most out of what I have... I will probably have Joel Reiser help me finalize the setup... But, the 850's really seem to agree with your style.
